Re: etiquette - replies, top posting, long threads etc.
- From: "§cİİt§" <guitarcool@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 05:05:55 GMT
you have to read down {instead of up} to find the question.
;;-) LOL
hey..wait!
*cough*~
{well... not that I ever do that..}
"and the question to the answer issss -"
it's like answering something first, then having someone
ask the question later. or something.
too bad conversations in real-life {"real life" ? huh? wassat..}
didn't go that way.
"Rick N. Backer" <ken.wilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Because it goes counter to the way we read and comprehend things.
comprehend things the way we read counter because it goes.
> Why is top posting bad?
see above.
.
- References:
- etiquette - replies, top posting, long threads etc.
- From: lazybones
- Re: etiquette - replies, top posting, long threads etc.
- From: proletariat
- Re: etiquette - replies, top posting, long threads etc.
- From: Rick N . Backer
- etiquette - replies, top posting, long threads etc.
- Prev by Date: OT: What time is Carls JR usually open to ?
- Next by Date: Re: etiquette - replies, top posting, long threads etc.
- Previous by thread: Re: etiquette - replies, top posting, long threads etc.
- Next by thread: Re: etiquette - replies, top posting, long threads etc.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|