Re: odd question - "cooking" the guitar?


Jim Anable wrote:
> Guncho wrote:
>
> > Jim Anable wrote:
> >
> >>Brian Running wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>>You are honestly telling me that you don't know that violinist, for
> >>>>years, have had the opinion that actually playing the instrument
> >>>>improves the tone? Really? I consider this to be common knowledge.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Jim, lots of people have opinions based on superstition, ignorance, or
> >>>just plain stupidity. I certainly wouldn't put violinists in the
> >>>classification of "scientific and objective."
> >>
> >>The guy said that he'd never heard of it.
> >>
> >>
> >>>>>Who says the guitar gets better with age due to "vibrations", maybe
> >>>>>it's the wood drying out a little and aging?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>I'm not even going to waste my time with this one...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>What's wrong with addressing a legitimate question objectively?
> >>
> >>Search his history of responses to me, and all will be made clear. The
> >>guy likes to argue with me, and I don't want to waste my time anymore.
> >>If you look at my general posts, you will find that I'm more than
> >>willing to discuss and explain things. When a person exhibits a
> >>repeated history of simply attacking anything that I say, I'll still
> >>give a response, but I will not waste my time going around in circles
> >>with him.
> >>
> >>He has tried my patience. I will give limited responses, but I won't
> >>fall into the trap of the continuous back and forth nonsense.
> >>
> >>Fair enough?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> How
> >>>about some facts? Afraid they would be contrary to your long-held
> >>>opinions?
> >>
> >>I only restated long held opinions of the masters. If you know better,
> >>I'm waiting...
> >>
> >>
> >>>I don't understand the resistance to the truth.
> >>
> >>Let's hear it!
> >
> >
> > What are you talking about? We've agreed on things before?
> >
> > Do you honestly thing I would ever disagree with you just for the sake
> > of disagreeing? I wouldn't.
>
> We have agreed before. But when you disagree, you go into this frenzy.
>
> > Sure there's a chance what you're saying is true, but I haven't seen
> > any evidence to support what you're saying.
> >
> > Chris
>
> Do you save your "sent" messages? If so, take a look.
>
> Remember the debate about pulling two of four power tubes, and
> compensating for speaker impedance? 'nuff said?

"nuff said??"

I relayed how to pull two power tubes in a manner anyone could
understand. You described it backwards?!?! So "nuff said" to you.

If you don't like me saying that this vibration thing is a wive's tale
then the easy way to shut me up would be to prove me wrong.

Chris

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Phoenicians
    ... The consensus is in that they did and do. ... Thomas L. Thompson. ... for saying things lots of people are saying" - because one of the ... History in particular. ...
    (soc.history.ancient)
  • Re: OT - If Sarah Palin Ever Reappears
    ... bad or worse than Palin's and his history is suspect, ... which is what he was saying George Bush should ... When people talk, they assert things as fact, like you and your "48%" figure. ... knows something about Russia because she can see Russia, ...
    (rec.music.classical.recordings)
  • Re: OT - If Sarah Palin Ever Reappears
    ... bad or worse than Palin's and his history is suspect, ... which is what he was saying George Bush should ... knows something about Russia because she can see Russia, ... You see right into his soul, that you can so confidently assert that in ...
    (rec.music.classical.recordings)
  • Re: Tony again refuses to answer; no film at eleven (old story)
    ... Actually, both history, and science as they are known today, did not exist ... They have their own translation errors, ... all competent bibical scholars disagree with Mr. Scott's claims about the ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: As the Hallmark love/hate holiday draws near...
    ... The astute reader is sure to understand that I am stating my opinion, and based on his or her own recollections of your posting history, is free to conclude whether I am accurate. ... you often accuse people of posting emotionally when neither they nor others reading think that the posts in question are emotional. ... If one person says I'm overreacting, I can disregard it, but when several start saying the same thing, I usually stop and try to examine what I've been doing. ...
    (soc.singles.moderated)