Re: Rock stars
- From: "Ricky Hunt" <rhunt22@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2005 22:07:41 GMT
"Jon" <texasrocker1@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:R12Te.7784$UI.3687@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> I have a hard time considering any new music "rock." Anything that
> resembles rap or hip-hop in any way, shape, or form is not rock music.
> There may be stars but very few are rock stars as far as I'm concerned.
I have to stop and remind myself that what I call rock-n-roll (Zep, etc.)
would in no way be considered rock-n-roll to someone from the fifties. The
meaning changes from generation to generation. If I just say "rock" though I
think that does apply to late 60's thru early 80's rock-n-roll.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Rock stars
- From: Jon
- Re: Rock stars
- References:
- Rock stars
- From: iarwain
- Re: Rock stars
- From: Jon
- Rock stars
- Prev by Date: Re: Les Paul tailpiece height question
- Next by Date: Re: I control all sound & vision now
- Previous by thread: Re: Rock stars
- Next by thread: Re: Rock stars
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|