Re: Squier '51 ?
- From: "Jeff" <catfisherman62@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:58:34 GMT
"Jim Anable" <jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:11ef8uu2vq1bsb7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> That's going too far. I've played only maybe a dozen Squiers, ever. I
> really never had an interest in them. NONE of them felt good to me.
>
I wont say that this statement is the answer, nope wont say it.
> But the fact of the matter is that you do NOT always get what you pay
> for, when it comes to guitars.
Unless its plywood
> But since guitars are made out of
> wood, you will find fine examples in ALL price ranges
There is a huge disparity in the quality of woods. If a brand of guitars in
made from an entire run of plywood, then they are all plywood.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Squier '51 ?
- From: Jim Anable
- Re: Squier '51 ?
- From: t h a d
- Re: Squier '51 ?
- References:
- Squier '51 ?
- From: _Bigred
- Re: Squier '51 ?
- From: Daniel Dreibelbis
- Re: Squier '51 ?
- From: Jeff
- Re: Squier '51 ?
- From: t h a d
- Re: Squier '51 ?
- From: Jeff
- Re: Squier '51 ?
- From: Jim Anable
- Squier '51 ?
- Prev by Date: Re: Squier '51 ?
- Next by Date: Re: Using new technology
- Previous by thread: Re: Squier '51 ?
- Next by thread: Re: Squier '51 ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|