Re: harmonizer
- From: the_cat <eshamble@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 11:19:04 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 10, 12:58 pm, "Craig 'Lumpy' Lemke" <lu...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
jtees and cat:
I will admit...the demo sounds really good, but I believe there is aYou're not.I had one for a week-& too it back .. (I'll bet there is a
lot of programming that went into that. I could be wrong.
reason it's been in a box for a year).
The professional audio recording engineers have specialists
that they call to have them do the auto tune on their recordings.
To think that a hundred dollar pedal would come anywhere close
to replacing the professional method would be like saying
"I could build a Mercedes. I'll go down to Home Depo and get
a welder and some bolts, I've got some metal scraps out back..."
It's not like there aren't singers out there that can
actually sing on pitch.
Lump
Yeah but this thing cost ~ $800-$900 , so it should be 9x better than
$100 crap ...
uhh 9 x zero is still zero... hmmmmm
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: harmonizer
- From: Craig 'Lumpy' Lemke
- Re: harmonizer
- References:
- harmonizer
- From: Pt
- Re: harmonizer
- From: jtees4
- Re: harmonizer
- From: the_cat
- Re: harmonizer
- From: Craig 'Lumpy' Lemke
- harmonizer
- Prev by Date: Re: harmonizer
- Next by Date: Re: harmonizer
- Previous by thread: Re: harmonizer
- Next by thread: Re: harmonizer
- Index(es):