Re: capo
- From: "RichL" <rpleavitt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 19:54:47 -0400
"Charmed Snark" <snark@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:Xns9D586EA623F0FSnarkCharmedImSure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
RichL expounded in news:kLKdncenL76xnlzWnZ2dnUVZ_rydnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxx:
"Sean" <sean@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Ez6wn.1266$z%6.187@xxxxxxxxxxx
On 10/04/10 2:13 PM, ed s wrote:On Apr 10, 12:28 pm, Sean<s...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:On 10/04/10 7:49 AM, David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 01:11:16 +0000, Sean wrote:
nauseous
And even if I couldn't, my mail application (just the standard
one that
comes with a Mac) puts a little red line under misspelled words.
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
It'll put a line under focussed, rhymes with locust, too. Instead,
the "correct" spelling is focused. Incredible. Unbelievable. Look
it up.
I lie not. Looks to me like spelling abuse. ;-) I can't stand it.
I'll stick with focussed. Regards, daveA
Ah, I think that's a British spelling vs. American spelling thing.
E.g., if you are using an American dictionary, it will tell you to
write "traveled" instead of "travelled." I certainly don't always
agree with the computer on spelling and grammar. I especially
dislike MS Word's grammar pronouncements.
But still, it can be helpful to have a spell checker. It would have
helped out the nauseous guy.
Your the only one getting nauseous over spelling - some of us just
roll with it, and enjoy life. e
You don't have a clue.
I think it's a rare occasion when you'll find me making a spelling or
grammatical mistake. But Ed's right -- consider the context (a
newsgroup, not a dissertation). We've all got our own strengths and
weaknesses, and the one in question is far too trivial to fuss about
here.
After all, this aint alt.guitars.phd :)
Snark
Favorite taunt to a mixed group of physicists and engineers:
"I useta not could spell engineer, now I are one!"
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: capo
- From: Charmed Snark
- Re: capo
- References:
- Re: capo
- From: Sean
- Re: capo
- From: David Raleigh Arnold
- Re: capo
- From: Tony Done
- Re: capo
- From: JimT
- Re: capo
- From: Tony Done
- Re: capo
- From: JimT
- Re: capo
- From: Sean
- Re: capo
- From: JimT
- Re: capo
- From: Charmed Snark
- Re: capo
- From: JimT
- Re: capo
- From: Charmed Snark
- Re: capo
- From: ed s
- Re: capo
- From: Sean
- Re: capo
- From: David Raleigh Arnold
- Re: capo
- From: Sean
- Re: capo
- From: ed s
- Re: capo
- From: Sean
- Re: capo
- From: RichL
- Re: capo
- From: Charmed Snark
- Re: capo
- Prev by Date: Re: The Light
- Next by Date: Re: Help! My first experience with Floyd Rose tremolo
- Previous by thread: Re: capo
- Next by thread: Re: capo
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|