Re: capo
- From: Sean <sean@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 22:02:12 GMT
On 10/04/10 2:13 PM, ed s wrote:
On Apr 10, 12:28 pm, Sean<s...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:On 10/04/10 7:49 AM, David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 01:11:16 +0000, Sean wrote:
nauseous
And even if I couldn't, my mail application (just the standard one that
comes with a Mac) puts a little red line under misspelled words.
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
It'll put a line under focussed, rhymes with locust, too. Instead,
the "correct" spelling is focused. Incredible. Unbelievable. Look it up.
I lie not. Looks to me like spelling abuse. ;-) I can't stand it. I'll
stick with focussed. Regards, daveA
Ah, I think that's a British spelling vs. American spelling thing. E.g.,
if you are using an American dictionary, it will tell you to write
"traveled" instead of "travelled." I certainly don't always agree with
the computer on spelling and grammar. I especially dislike MS Word's
grammar pronouncements.
But still, it can be helpful to have a spell checker. It would have
helped out the nauseous guy.
Your the only one getting nauseous over spelling - some of us just
roll with it, and enjoy life. e
You don't have a clue.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: capo
- From: RichL
- Re: capo
- References:
- Re: capo
- From: Sean
- Re: capo
- From: David Raleigh Arnold
- Re: capo
- From: Tony Done
- Re: capo
- From: JimT
- Re: capo
- From: Tony Done
- Re: capo
- From: JimT
- Re: capo
- From: Sean
- Re: capo
- From: JimT
- Re: capo
- From: Charmed Snark
- Re: capo
- From: JimT
- Re: capo
- From: Charmed Snark
- Re: capo
- From: ed s
- Re: capo
- From: Sean
- Re: capo
- From: David Raleigh Arnold
- Re: capo
- From: Sean
- Re: capo
- From: ed s
- Re: capo
- Prev by Date: Re: capo
- Next by Date: Re: capo
- Previous by thread: Re: capo
- Next by thread: Re: capo
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|