Re: Buying a guitar
- From: Charmed Snark <snark@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 17:01:02 +0000 (UTC)
Mr. Green expounded in
news:ba70087d-89ab-43eb-be93-9f953dc057c7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
On 14 May, 15:30, "richard branson" <rich...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:...
I would love to buy a Les Paul, just visited the local guitar shope
and th
fella said you are just as well buying a Vintage and get basicallyme
the sa
guitar. You are just paying for the name with the Gibson.0+?
I realise there will be SOME difference, but is the diffence really
£80
I suspect it was salesman speak so I would like independant advice.
So can anyone advise me on the differences.
Cheers guys.
Vintage is one of the good budget brands. They do make some nice
guitars but thier quality can be a bit up and down. Many would argue
that a good mid priced instrument can be pretty well equal in tone and
playability to a top brand like Gibson.
Green
I still love my Epiphone LP, though she's a heavy girl.
Snark.
.
- References:
- Buying a guitar
- From: richard branson
- Re: Buying a guitar
- From: Mr. Green
- Buying a guitar
- Prev by Date: Re: Tractor rhythm section
- Next by Date: Re: Buying a guitar
- Previous by thread: Re: Buying a guitar
- Next by thread: Re: Buying a guitar
- Index(es):