Re: Superclamp
- From: Rufus <not@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 07:12:21 GMT
Lumpy wrote:
RichL wrote:I still think there's a legitimate issue in the sense that I believe
that the time period over which musical works are protected is
excessive.
I believe it's the opposite.
Music should be protected forever,
just like real property.
Real property certainly isn't "protected forever" - it changes hands to the highest bidder or strongest force just like anything else...just ask anyone whom lost their property and/or family heirlooms during WWII (or their family, for that matter...), or in the middle east...
....or try telling the people that built a shopping mall over my family's historical 1/8 acre graveyard in Tennessee to tear down that mall give it back - or even pay us for it...I don't even know what they did with the bodies..."protected".
Nothing is "protected".
--
- Rufus
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Superclamp
- From: Lumpy
- Re: Superclamp
- References:
- Supertramp
- From: Screaming Eagles 101
- Re: Supertramp
- From: Andy_D
- Re: Supertramp
- From: Screaming Eagles 101
- Re: Supertramp
- From: Lumpy
- Re: Supertramp
- From: Screaming Eagles 101
- Re: Supertramp
- From: Mark Seery
- Re: Supertramp
- From: Jack
- Re: Supertramp
- From: Mark Seery
- Re: Supertramp
- From: Tim C.
- Re: Supertramp
- From: Paul P
- Re: Supertramp
- From: Tim C.
- Re: Supertramp
- From: Lumpy
- Re: Supertramp
- From: Tim C.
- Re: Supertramp
- From: Lumpy
- Re: Supertramp
- From: RichL
- Re: Supertramp
- From: Lumpy
- Re: Supertramp
- From: Paul P
- Re: Supertramp
- From: RichL
- Re: Superclamp
- From: Lumpy
- Supertramp
- Prev by Date: Re: Playing Slide in Standard Tuning
- Next by Date: Re: Superclamp
- Previous by thread: Re: Superclamp
- Next by thread: Re: Superclamp
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|