Re: bad set up or low quality guitar?
- From: Charmed Snark <snark@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 17:06:02 -0400
Lumpy expounded in news:68rhk4F2u8np2U1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
Charmed Snark wrote:
Ya, I probably overdo the treble
in my mixes as I know that my top
end is diminishing also...
There might be a good arguement for mixing done
with "senior ears" if the target audience has
similar auditory maturity. No sense in mixing
for 18 year olds if it's going to be heard
primarily by 50 year olds.
Kind of the "reader's digest large font" version
of a mixdown.
Lumpy
True, but OTOH, if you play any commercial CDs
at all (presumably targeted at younger ears, or
to at one time younger ears ;-) ) , and then
introduce your mix with extra treble, then a
re-tweaking of the stereo will be necessary
to put things back into proper balance.
Snark.
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
.
- References:
- bad set up or low quality guitar?
- From: tysteel
- Re: bad set up or low quality guitar?
- From: Tony Done
- Re: bad set up or low quality guitar?
- From: RichL
- Re: bad set up or low quality guitar?
- From: Tony Done
- Re: bad set up or low quality guitar?
- From: RichL
- Re: bad set up or low quality guitar?
- From: Charmed Snark
- Re: bad set up or low quality guitar?
- From: Tony Done
- Re: bad set up or low quality guitar?
- From: RichL
- Re: bad set up or low quality guitar?
- From: Charmed Snark
- Re: bad set up or low quality guitar?
- From: Lumpy
- bad set up or low quality guitar?
- Prev by Date: Re: A confusing day at GC
- Next by Date: Re: TV as a practice aid?
- Previous by thread: Re: bad set up or low quality guitar?
- Next by thread: Re: bad set up or low quality guitar?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|