Re: When purchasing acoustic Guitars, it's better to get a cutaway.
- From: "Greg Cisko" <gcisko@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 16:09:58 -0500
"Ravi" <Raul.Fremont@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1c3a0a73-878a-4d8a-b4c9-e640981a9e71@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
It is better to have an acoustic with a cutaway neck so that you can
access the higher frets.
I have an old Guild which has limited access -- especially for barre
chords-- on the higher frets. I wish my teacher had mentioned the
limitation when he sold me the guitar.
Everyone is different. I have both a cutaway, and normal dreadnaught.
The first thing I found about the cutaway is that it makes lead playing
much easier higher up the neck. The cutaway does nothing else for
me personally at all. I find no chords that play better or easier because
of the cutaway.
Some argue the cutaway design affects the tone (I can't hear it).
I am sure some will!
Other that that, there's no reason not to get a cutaway.
As I said above, if you never play lead, no need for a cutaway.
Everyone likes to play on higher frets once in a while.
I don't really like to on my acoustic. But everyone is different.
--
gcisko@xxxxxxxxxxx
The Pentatonic Scale Explained
http://bluechainlightning.net
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Technique question
- Next by Date: Re: When purchasing acoustic Guitars, it's better to get a cutaway.
- Previous by thread: Re: When purchasing acoustic Guitars, it's better to get a cutaway.
- Next by thread: Re: When purchasing acoustic Guitars, it's better to get a cutaway.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|