Re: Pod or new amp?
- From: "Lumpy" <lumpy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 23:07:00 -0700
Dave Turner wrote:
Yep but the original poster only has ~US$240
to work with. For that amount, and considering
he's probably a beginner (going by the newsgroup
title 8), i think he'll get a lot more bang for his buck...
Assuming you're answering me, although you didn't
quote anything so I can't really be sure...
I feel like you're running down the street, dropping
arguement clauses here and there, in no particular
order and not necessarily sticking to the same
set of arguements.
First you say a POD isn't going to sound as good
as a dedicated amp.
Then you say the POD will sound just fine and it's
fun to have the versatility to experiment.
Then you say, "but the OP has only $240". And add the
elusive "He's just a beginner" clause.
I suppose we could chase pros and cons forever.
Lumpy
--
You Played on Lawrence Welk?
Yes but no blue notes. Just blue hairs.
www.lumpyguitar.net
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Pod or new amp?
- From: Dave Van
- Re: Pod or new amp?
- References:
- Pod or new amp?
- From: Stefan
- Re: Pod or new amp?
- From: Jim
- Re: Pod or new amp?
- From: Lumpy
- Re: Pod or new amp?
- From: Lumpy
- Pod or new amp?
- Prev by Date: Re: How to stop playing guitar in 60 minutes
- Next by Date: Re: Which well known guitarist has the most guitars? (Clapton has 7...
- Previous by thread: Re: Pod or new amp?
- Next by thread: Re: Pod or new amp?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|