Re: Who is watching Amer. Idol?
- From: "RichL" <rpleavitt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 18:27:42 -0400
Brian Running <brunning@xxxxxxx> wrote:
RichL wrote:
Here ya go, ya big lug:
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/homophobes
"homophobia -
Noun
intense hatred or fear of homosexuals [homo(sexual) + phobia]
Collins Essential English Dictionary 2nd Edition 2006 © HarperCollins
Publishers 2004, 2006."
We all know that popular usage makes incorrect definitions accepted.
That's not the point. The point is, "homophobia" does not mean
"hatred of homosexuals" in English.
What you really mean is that the word does not mean what it would if one
only examined its derivation. However you or I may not like it, words
*do* acquire meaning and become accepted simply because they are used in
association with that meaning with sufficient frequency.
Just because there are notations
of popular usage on web sites doesn't change the meaning of the word,
Rich.
It's more than a "notation of popular usage" on a web site, Brian. It's
a published dictionary:
<http://www.amazon.com/Collins-Essential-English-Dictionary/dp/000715498
4/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1243894756&sr=8-3>
"Homophobia" is a made-up word that doesn't make sense. There are
ways to create words correctly, why not do that? We've already got
misogyny, misandry and misanthropy, why not a word that actually
means hatred of homosexuals, rather than "fear of the same"? I think
Kevin's argument is probably right on the nose.
This bugs me the same way that made-up words like preciseness,
normalcy, etc., are used and accepted. Every time a word is misused
and then becomes accepted in its misused form, we lose a precise
means of expressing something -- words that develop from popular
misusage seem always to devolve towards broader and more-general
meanings, and we lose something. "Gay" is an example. What word has
replaced the precise meaning of gay, with the subtle connotations of
the former usage?
I'm not disagreeing with that viewpoint at all; it's a pet peeve of
yours, obviously, and it's a bit of a peeve of mine as well. I never
found it necessary to use the word "proactive" for example. But the
world rolls along in a way that's largely unaffected by what you or I
may think, Brian.
A bigger pet peeve of mine is the use of a diversion into etymology to
deflect attention from what a lot of people would consider inappropriate
behavior, no matter what you choose to call it.
.
- References:
- Re: Who is watching Amer. Idol?
- From: Jess Band-ee-Coot
- Re: Who is watching Amer. Idol?
- From: The Sicker Vicar
- Re: Who is watching Amer. Idol?
- From: Jess Band-ee-Coot
- Re: Who is watching Amer. Idol?
- From: The Sicker Vicar
- Re: Who is watching Amer. Idol?
- From: RichL
- Re: Who is watching Amer. Idol?
- From: Brian Running
- Re: Who is watching Amer. Idol?
- From: RichL
- Re: Who is watching Amer. Idol?
- From: Brian Running
- Re: Who is watching Amer. Idol?
- From: RichL
- Re: Who is watching Amer. Idol?
- From: Brian Running
- Re: Who is watching Amer. Idol?
- Prev by Date: Re: Who is watching Amer. Idol?
- Next by Date: Re: Who is watching Amer. Idol?
- Previous by thread: Re: Who is watching Amer. Idol?
- Next by thread: Re: Who is watching Amer. Idol?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|