Re: agb.com has new owner

Jim Carr wrote:
Brian Running wrote:

I don't know, Steve, is it really civil to accuse someone of trying to put over an evil, hidden agenda?

I gotta call Party Foul here. It seems pretty clear that the charity is religious in nature and anti-abortion. How can anyone say that's not controversial?

It is controversial, but it wasn't a hidden agenda. It was as plain as the nose on your face. It didn't appear to me to be anything sneaky, hidden or underhanded -- which seemed to be Steve's implication.

As for whether Steve should be allowed to comment, consider this:

Of course he can comment. Only Mike Rieves told him to shut up, and Mike Rieves... well, you know. But Steve can comment, just as anyone can. And then, people can comment on his comments, too.

All these pixels being spilled over this, and you guys who weren't even here back then don't even know all the drama. You don't even know the half of it.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: agb.com has new owner
    ... but it wasn't a hidden agenda. ... Only Mike Rieves told him to shut up, ... But Steve can comment, just as anyone can. ... AGB site and post links to controversial subjects, ...
    (alt.guitar.bass)
  • Re: News: Flatfish evolution was neither fluke nor turbot-charged.
    ... papers slip through the peer review process. ... August 2005 issue of Nature. ... Hidden agenda "drive for achievement". ... So post the "dozens more". ...
    (talk.origins)