Re: The 16 year old singer review.....
- From: Jim Carr <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 12:23:26 -0700
The Bishop wrote:
Way to miss the point, El Groucho! The word "typically" introduces
doubt, which makes your cock-sure attitude the PROBLEM, not the
solution.
Huh?
Typically means more likely than not. Generally speaking, when people don't include a word like "typically" they still don't mean "absolutely all" unless they explicitly say so.
The thing is Usenet generally forces most people to use various qualifiers and disclaimers so that some people don't get a bit riled by often assuming that some people are possibly stating some things in the absolute.
Also, IMHO Usenet generally forces most people state their opinions less forcefully. It seems to me, at least, that stating your opinion without all sorts of disclaimers about how you might be wrong and how all other opinions are equally valid could, I think, possibly result people accusing you of being "cocksure" or arrogant. Of course, YMMV.
--
Write a wise saying and your name will live forever.
- Anonymous
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The 16 year old singer review.....
- From: JoeSpareBedroom
- Re: The 16 year old singer review.....
- References:
- Re: The 16 year old singer review.....
- From: Jim Carr
- Re: The 16 year old singer review.....
- From: JoeSpareBedroom
- Re: The 16 year old singer review.....
- From: Jim Carr
- Re: The 16 year old singer review.....
- From: The Bishop
- Re: The 16 year old singer review.....
- From: Jim Carr
- Re: The 16 year old singer review.....
- From: The Bishop
- Re: The 16 year old singer review.....
- Prev by Date: Re: Unbelievable
- Next by Date: Re: Your Favorite Bassist Thread!
- Previous by thread: Re: The 16 year old singer review.....
- Next by thread: Re: The 16 year old singer review.....
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|