Re: Milwaukee...flake or pro?
- From: "Jim Carr" <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 20:45:51 -0700
"DGDevin" <dgdevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:OEkLh.14587$Jl.2944@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Jim Carr" <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1rfLh.9799$Ng1.5420@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Note to Self: The <sarcasm> and </sarcasm> tags are to easily missed to
be of any value. Or perhaps people don't know that it means I turned on
sarcasm mode and then turned it off when I was done.
Maybe send another note to self concerning sarcasm and satire not being
interchangeable terms.
I was actually being sardonic more so than sarcastic. In no way was I being
satirical. I would say that if ignorance were corn flakes, you'd be General
Mills, but you'd probably point out that General Mills doesn't make corn
flakes. :-)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Milwaukee...flake or pro?
- From: DGDevin
- Re: Milwaukee...flake or pro?
- References:
- Milwaukee...flake or pro?
- From: Pt
- Re: Milwaukee...flake or pro?
- From: JoeSpareBedroom
- Re: Milwaukee...flake or pro?
- From: Jim Carr
- Re: Milwaukee...flake or pro?
- From: DGDevin
- Re: Milwaukee...flake or pro?
- From: Jim Carr
- Re: Milwaukee...flake or pro?
- From: DGDevin
- Milwaukee...flake or pro?
- Prev by Date: Re: Bar People
- Next by Date: Re: Bar People
- Previous by thread: Re: Milwaukee...flake or pro?
- Next by thread: Re: Milwaukee...flake or pro?
- Index(es):