Re: Milwaukee...flake or pro?
- From: "Jim Carr" <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 11:21:49 -0700
"DGDevin" <dgdevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ZgfLh.13927$tD2.6198@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Jim Carr" <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ApVKh.968$s8.712@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<sarcasm>
He's a musician, man. They don't work like the robots in Corporate
America. I suppose you expect him to set up a video conference at 7:00 AM
so you can conduct a formal interview?
</sarcasm>
He might be a musician, but apparently not a professional musician. Or is
treating other musicians shabbily, like, okay, man?
Note to Self: The <sarcasm> and </sarcasm> tags are to easily missed to be
of any value. Or perhaps people don't know that it means I turned on sarcasm
mode and then turned it off when I was done.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Milwaukee...flake or pro?
- From: DGDevin
- Re: Milwaukee...flake or pro?
- References:
- Milwaukee...flake or pro?
- From: Pt
- Re: Milwaukee...flake or pro?
- From: JoeSpareBedroom
- Re: Milwaukee...flake or pro?
- From: Jim Carr
- Re: Milwaukee...flake or pro?
- From: DGDevin
- Milwaukee...flake or pro?
- Prev by Date: Re: Advice for new amplicfication
- Next by Date: Bar People
- Previous by thread: Re: Milwaukee...flake or pro?
- Next by thread: Re: Milwaukee...flake or pro?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|