Re: OT| So, it seems that....
- From: claudel@xxxxxxxxx (Claude V. Lucas)
- Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 18:56:49 +0000 (UTC)
In article <7f-dnXRPt4wBeirSnZ2dnUVZ_uGdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
gonjah <gonjah.net> sniffed:
On 5/19/2012 1:28 PM, Claude V. Lucas wrote:
In article<UuidnQcrT7jXfCrSnZ2dnUVZ_j6dnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
gonjah<gonjah@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 5/19/2012 12:41 PM, Claude V. Lucas wrote:I said that you are a pinhead.
In article<ufOdna-ut_CDRyrSnZ2dnUVZ_rednZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,Refute what? You said it's a conspiracy. I say it's not. What do you want?
gonjah<gonjah.net> cried:
On 5/19/2012 12:24 PM, Claude V. Lucas wrote:If you disagree with a statement, perhaps you should
In article<Bb2dnZ8OgutmISrSnZ2dnUVZ_rSdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,Everything is a joke to you. Haha. Funny man.
gonjah<gonjah@xxxxxxxxxx> bleated:
On 5/19/2012 10:12 AM, Claude V. Lucas wrote:No.
In article<9p6dnQ9_NvbaKyrSnZ2dnUVZ_omdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,"pinheads"?
gonjah<gonjah@xxxxxxxxxx> blubbered:
On 5/19/2012 9:54 AM, Claude V. Lucas wrote:No doubt.
In article<CsudnbqYFfzVNSrSnZ2dnUVZ_tidnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,So that's what you think? Well, I'm not surprised.
gonjah<gonjah.net> snivelled:
On 5/19/2012 6:28 AM, Claude V. Lucas wrote:The *really* hilarious part is that you don't seem to be appeased.
In article<uPCdneuijM_1nSrSnZ2dnUVZ_vudnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,Yup. It's a big conspiracy played out on TV in front of everybody. I
gonjah<gonjah.net> wrote:
On 5/18/2012 9:04 PM, Spender wrote:To appease the whining nitwits.
On Fri, 18 May 2012 08:59:33 -0500, gonjah<gonjah.net> wrote:Whatever. You seem to know it all. Why's he being charged at all.
On 5/18/2012 12:39 AM, Spender wrote:So that's three witnesses who saw Martin on top of Zimmerman, and one
On Thu, 17 May 2012 19:54:29 -0500, "Jim T"<jthread@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:I'm not going to look it up. It was on the news. Maybe CNN.
"Spender"<Spender@xxxxxxxx> wrote in messageCan you provide a reference? This article reports three witnesses
news:1a6br7l2pdjefvlk9pn0jetoss2f3fmeo0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Maybe because of the witness who saw Martin on top of Zimmerman.What about the others that said they saw z on m?
supporting Zimmerman's claims:
http://abcnews.go.com/US/cops-witnesses-back-george-zimmermans-version/story?id=16371852
"Maybe CNN" witness who saw it the other way.
The physical evidence seems to support the first three. Zimmerman's back
was wet and he clearly had cuts on the back of his head.
guess they did understand what a "conspiracy" really means.
The white's are conspiring to arrest the white/Hispanic guy because he
legally shot a black guy. Happens all the time if it's happened once.
Yep. I'm thrilled.
Any time you pinheads can turn a daily episode of "Tales From The Hood" into
a combined anti-self-defense *and* racial issue has to be a thrill for you.
Are you perpetually stuck in Jr High?
Why?
Was my depiction of you as a "pinhead" somehow inaccurate?
consider *refuting* it rather than *affirming*...
Nah.
You proved me correct.
I'm not sure I should want more than that of you.
I'd probably be mildly disappointed.
I guess it's going over your head.
Nope.
Pinhead.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT| So, it seems that....
- From: gonjah
- Re: OT| So, it seems that....
- References:
- Re: OT| So, it seems that....
- From: Bruce Morgen
- Re: OT| So, it seems that....
- From: gonjah
- Re: OT| So, it seems that....
- From: Claude V. Lucas
- Re: OT| So, it seems that....
- From: gonjah
- Re: OT| So, it seems that....
- Prev by Date: OT| "I AIN'T RAYSHUL PREJUDICED"
- Next by Date: Re: OT| So, it seems that....
- Previous by thread: Re: OT| So, it seems that....
- Next by thread: Re: OT| So, it seems that....
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|