Re: OT - new FAA guidelines for First Lady/VP planes
- From: "RichL" <rpleavitt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 19:18:07 -0400
"Mr Soul" <pcDAW@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:be38d1b8-3143-48b1-8b10-f6c47d493c55@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thank God, the FAA have issued new guidelines planes carrying the
First Lady and the VP. This incident earlier in the week could have
ended in tragedy.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704658704576275473734980028.html
With all due respect to the First and Second Ladies, what about us? Controllers sleeping on the job, near misses piling up, etc. Is this all new or has it been kept under wraps until recently? Is it some sort of undeclared resistance action by the controllers in response to -- what?
There's something unsaid here (but I don't know what it is). The story as it's come out so far doesn't hang together right, big picture wise.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT - new FAA guidelines for First Lady/VP planes
- From: Mr Soul
- Re: OT - new FAA guidelines for First Lady/VP planes
- From: Claude V. Lucas
- Re: OT - new FAA guidelines for First Lady/VP planes
- From: Tony Elka
- Re: OT - new FAA guidelines for First Lady/VP planes
- References:
- OT - new FAA guidelines for First Lady/VP planes
- From: Mr Soul
- OT - new FAA guidelines for First Lady/VP planes
- Prev by Date: OT| Another one bites the dust.
- Next by Date: Re: OT - new FAA guidelines for First Lady/VP planes
- Previous by thread: OT - new FAA guidelines for First Lady/VP planes
- Next by thread: Re: OT - new FAA guidelines for First Lady/VP planes
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|