Re: LIBTARDS 101 - an introduction to leftism.



"RichL" wrote in message news:uPSdncd5FtKM5RfQnZ2dnUVZ_sOdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"Tony Elka" <shadowlane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:shadowlane-B9948F.15094023032011@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <6rnko65m6q7vf58qdko28etppb8jsafn1a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Spender <Spender@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 08:12:29 -0700, Tony Elka <shadowlane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

>In article <p53ko697hvdkjn4s5lem5u2edisu4ea9q3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> Spender <Spender@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> The government and independent reports showed that the gulf oil leak >> had
>> nothing to do with cost cutting measures. It was an accident plain and
>> simple.
>
>What's your source for that?

http://www.oilspillcommission.gov/sites/default/files/documents/DEEPWATER_Repo
rttothePresident_FINAL.pdf



I looked, for some reason the PFD file only displayed the cover page of
the report. I'd really like to see the whole thing, so a corrected link
would be welcome.

Hmmmm, I was able to download the whole thing and read enough of it to
realize that Spender's claim is absolutely bogus.

=======================

Seems to be a faulty design in the blow out preventer.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110323/ap_on_bi_ge/us_gulf_oil_spill_investigation

It could be argued there wasn't enough redundancy.

Jim

.