Re: Global Warming Still Real
- From: Tony Elka <shadowlane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 11:21:27 -0800
In article <8tydnXQe8Z0-5aHQnZ2dnUVZ_g2dnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"RichL" <rpleavitt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"west" <west77062@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ihhliv$luv$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
DGDevin wrote:
"Green/Pace" wrote in message
news:ihcrdn$ilj$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Go read the article !
Was it written by climate scientists? No? Then why would anyone consider
it more persuasive than what the overwhelming majority of climate
scientists are saying?
How does one become a "Climate Scientist"?
Presumably by studying "Physics", "Chemistry", "Meteorology", or some
combination of those and other "Sciences", and then specializing.
There's some math and statistical course requirements along the way to
those college degrees too. And then you have to do some real work, with
findings that can be duplicated by others, peer review, etc.
Why is science such a mystery to some people?
Tony
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Global Warming Still Real
- From: RichL
- Re: Global Warming Still Real
- References:
- OT: Global Warming Still Real
- From: Flying V
- Re: OT: Global Warming Still Real
- From: Nomen Nescio
- Re: OT: Global Warming Still Real
- From: Bruce Morgen
- Re: OT: Global Warming Still Real
- From: Green/Pace
- Re: OT: Global Warming Still Real
- From: Tony Elka
- Re: OT: Global Warming Still Real
- From: Bruce Morgen
- Re: OT: Global Warming Still Real
- From: Green/Pace
- Re: Global Warming Still Real
- From: DGDevin
- Re: Global Warming Still Real
- From: west
- Re: Global Warming Still Real
- From: RichL
- OT: Global Warming Still Real
- Prev by Date: Re: Global Warming Still Real
- Next by Date: Re: Global Warming Still Real
- Previous by thread: Re: Global Warming Still Real
- Next by thread: Re: Global Warming Still Real
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|