Re: "Baker Street" cover
- From: RS <RS@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 16:44:19 -0500
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 14:38:48 -0500, It's that Guy again...
<paidtodothis@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
That's even worse. You can't face the fact that some here have
real life amp related history, and present and future lives that
are ON TOPIC to this newsgroup.
You really haven't been paying attention, have you. By the way,
there's a difference between doing engineering and design work vs
hawking tubes on usenet, or simply flapping on aga about what an icon
you are.
I am frolicsome, I am easy,
OK, I'll give you that much.
What are the reference numbers of the patents you keep talking about?
Just curious.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: "Baker Street" cover
- From: Lord Valve
- Re: "Baker Street" cover
- References:
- "Baker Street" cover
- From: RichL
- Re: "Baker Street" cover
- From: Lord Valve
- Re: "Baker Street" cover
- From: It's that Guy again . . .
- Re: "Baker Street" cover
- From: Lord Valve
- Re: "Baker Street" cover
- From: Jim T
- Re: "Baker Street" cover
- From: Lord Valve
- Re: "Baker Street" cover
- From: Jim T
- Re: "Baker Street" cover
- From: It's that Guy again . . .
- Re: "Baker Street" cover
- From: RS
- Re: "Baker Street" cover
- From: It's that Guy again . . .
- "Baker Street" cover
- Prev by Date: Re: Mate
- Next by Date: Re: "Baker Street" cover
- Previous by thread: Re: "Baker Street" cover
- Next by thread: Re: "Baker Street" cover
- Index(es):