Re: OT - McMahon wins (after spending $22 million)

From: Tony Elka <shadowlane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 19:05:25 -0700

In article <4c633002$0$11812$bbae4d71@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
WB <nospam@xxxxxx> wrote:

On 8/11/2010 5:22 PM, Tony Elka wrote:

I'm siding with Spock : "seems quite illogical" ...

Mr. Spock would have understood the motivation DGDevin explained.

Read it again

I understood it quite well the first time !

I don't think you did.

Tony
.

References:
- OT - McMahon wins (after spending $22 million)
  - From: Mr Soul
- Re: OT - McMahon wins (after spending $22 million)
  - From: WB
- Re: OT - McMahon wins (after spending $22 million)
  - From: DGDevin
- Re: OT - McMahon wins (after spending $22 million)
  - From: WB
- Re: OT - McMahon wins (after spending $22 million)
  - From: Tony Elka
- Re: OT - McMahon wins (after spending $22 million)
  - From: WB

Prev by Date: Re: OT - McMahon wins (after spending $22 million)
Next by Date: Re: ...you'd think this guy would at least avoid the semblance...
Previous by thread: Re: OT - McMahon wins (after spending $22 million)
Next by thread: Re: OT - McMahon wins (after spending $22 million)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread