Re: OT - McMahon wins (after spending $22 million)

From: WB <nospam@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 12:11:54 -0500

On 8/11/2010 7:46 AM, Mr Soul wrote:

McMahon spent $22 million for a come-from-behind convention victory,
but still fell just short of topping the 50 percent mark in Tuesday’s
three-way Republican primary. "

There is something incredibly stupid about spending millions on a job
pays $100k ... I mean .. these people are suppose to be *conservative* !
.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT - McMahon wins (after spending $22 million)
  - From: DGDevin
- Re: OT - McMahon wins (after spending $22 million)
  - From: Lord Valve

References:
- OT - McMahon wins (after spending $22 million)
  - From: Mr Soul

Prev by Date: Re: OT - McMahon wins (after spending $22 million)
Next by Date: Re: OT - McMahon wins (after spending $22 million)
Previous by thread: Re: OT - McMahon wins (after spending $22 million)
Next by thread: Re: OT - McMahon wins (after spending $22 million)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: OT - McMahon wins (after spending $22 million)
... McMahon spent $22 million for a come-from-behind convention victory, ... but still fell just short of topping the 50 percent mark in Tuesday?s ...
(alt.guitar.amps)
Re: OT - McMahon wins (after spending $22 million)
... "Lord Valve" wrote in message ... > McMahon spent $22 million for a come-from-behind convention victory, ... > but still fell just short of topping the 50 percent mark in Tuesday's ...
(alt.guitar.amps)