Re: OT| Republicans..the lowest single number...since 1983.
- From: ":-)" <lafaexaminer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 08:20:15 -0700 (PDT)
On Oct 20, 10:53 pm, Libcrusher Smith <libscrus...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
The liberal crash of 2010 has already begun -
Why do people argue with this confused homosexual child of 19?
Brooksley Born ...she was a regular "lib". ;-)
http://www.google.com/search?q=brooksley+born+vindicated&rls=com.microsoft:en-us:IE-SearchBox&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&sourceid=ie7&rlz=1I7ADBF
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT| Republicans..the lowest single number...since 1983.
- From: Libcrusher Smith
- Re: OT| Republicans..the lowest single number...since 1983.
- References:
- OT| Republicans..the lowest single number...since 1983.
- From: Bruce Morgen
- Re: OT| Republicans..the lowest single number...since 1983.
- From: Libcrusher Smith
- Re: OT| Republicans..the lowest single number...since 1983.
- From: Bruce Morgen
- Re: OT| Republicans..the lowest single number...since 1983.
- From: Libcrusher Smith
- OT| Republicans..the lowest single number...since 1983.
- Prev by Date: Re: Austin City Limits year 35
- Next by Date: Re: When a nutter's socks all attempt simul-anonymity
- Previous by thread: Re: OT| Republicans..the lowest single number...since 1983.
- Next by thread: Re: OT| Republicans..the lowest single number...since 1983.
- Index(es):
