Re: Sucks to be a lib that hates himself

Twibil wrote:

Poor pathetic fool. Nobody said that but *you*, but it seems that
arguing with your own straw men is about all you're capable of.
Here's how a "strawman" argument sequence works, so that you can avoid
making a public fool of yourself in future:

First; tell a lie about what someone said.

Second; put "quotes" around it -as you did above- to make it look as
if it were *really* their words. (OOOHHHHHH! Clever! Nobody will
*ever* notice!)

Thirdly; try to hold them up to ridicule for saying something that
everyone knows perfectly well that they never said.

Lastly; wonder why it didn't work, and why everyone's laughing at you.

But the good news is that with that out of the way all you have to
deal with now are the facts that dictionaries are non-partisan, that
they *do* get to define words -and you *don't*- and that you're
replying to a life-long conservative while at the same time trying to
pretend that "conservative" and "racist" are synonyms.

They aren't now, they never have been, and they never will be.

The sad thing about the way Spewboi and those like him communicate is that
sooner or later it's going to affect the way they think. So even if at
first they know they're lying (but believe lies are justified in advancing
their cause) over time the constant reliance on falsehood is bound to
influence their thinking. I think Spewboi is still aware when he's
lying--he just doesn't care. But the day will come when he really can't
tell the difference between reality and the world of deception where he's
chosen to live, and that day might not be far away.


.

Quantcast