Re: Nazis, eh? I gotcher Nazis, right here...

TPS wrote:
On Aug 17, 9:57 am, White Spirit <wspi...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
TPS wrote:
On Aug 17, 7:10 am, White Spirit <wspi...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The entire British population quite
obviously includes people with many different genetic backgrounds, as
you're quite fond of pointing out when you complain about being
"invaded".
Obviously, I'm not counting foreign migrants from the past fifty or so
years in my definition of being English.
So you restrict the study to people that you have defined as English,
and the study finds that these people are English. Brilliant
scholarship there!
Being English means being part of an ethnic group so of course it
doesn't include every Tom, *** and Harry who enter the country.

Can you not see that this is circular logic? That the game is fixed
from the start?

He cannot, apparently.

You want to show that the population shares a specific genetic
inheritance, and thus that there is an "indigenous" ethnicity. So you
only test the DNA of people who you have already decided are an
indigenous ethnic group. If you cherry pick the DNA samples, of
course you can get the results that you're looking for.

Land - be it the Schleswig-Holstein region or jolly olde England, does
not have a DNA. People do, but as Les keeps pointing out, people
move.


And they move into and out of islands a whole lot.

--
Les Cargill
.

Loading