Re: Numbers don't add up for global warming
- From: Benj <bjacoby@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 22:22:47 -0700 (PDT)
On Sep 26, 9:19 am, "RichL" <rpleav...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
These basic conclusions have been endorsed by at least 30 scientific
societies and academies of science, including all of the national
academies of science of the major industrialized countries. While
individual scientists have voiced disagreement with some findings of the
IPCC, the overwhelming majority of scientists working on climate change
agree with the IPCC's main conclusions.
Let's see....hmmmm....do I accept the conclusions of these august
scientific bodies (including The American Physical Society, to which I
belong) or an unknown person ranting on a right-wing web site?
Lessee. Do I agree with the academy giving Michael Moore an Oscar for
his so-called "documentary" with faked footage and spliced text? Does
that make the documentary "truth" or does it make the academy a
politically driven organization? Does Algore winning the Nobel prize
mean he invented the Internet and AGW? Does it mean he's telling the
truth? Gosh He won an Oscar from the SAME guys that thought Moore's
creation was "truth" too! This makes it all very convincing stuff,
right? Anyway, the statement that the "overwheming majority" of
scientists agree with the politically-driven IPCC is a flat out lie.
And even if it were true, it is no proof that IPCC conclusions are
correct. 30,000 scientists have resisted political pressure to
denounce the IPCC propaganda.
The truth is that Carbon CANNOT have the effect on climate change the
IPCC says it does. It's a scientific impossibility! And Yes I AM a
scientist with the credentials to prove it.
Tough choice?
Not at all once you understand the way Algore (and the IPCC) have
cleverly reversed causality by saying that increased CO2 levels causes
ocean temperatures to rise. The truth is the reverse. Increase Ocean
temperatures causes the oceans to throw off CO2 and therefore increase
the atmospheric levels. It's just like soda pop! These guys think you
all are too stupid to figure out they are lying. They figure they'll
take the money and run before the shit hits the fan (Now where have we
seen that done before? Oh yeah. The current loan crisis!)
So just who do you trust? Any technical person you ask who isn't
fearing for his job, or politicans? I mean, politicians never lie, do
they? And they certainly have no interest in money making scams.
And I'll even add one more item. Given the widespread pointing out on
the Internet that CO2 simply cannot cause AGW, the IPCC and others
have now backpedaled and have come up with a totally NEW explantion
that they call a "feedback theory" to show how the impossible can
still be possible. Too bad this new theory is even MORE BOGUS than the
original lies.
RichL You really need to do more than just BELONG to these
organizations. You really need to understand science.
Politics ain't science.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Numbers don't add up for global warming
- From: RS
- Re: Numbers don't add up for global warming
- From: Lord Valve
- Re: Numbers don't add up for global warming
- From: Rich Koerner
- Re: Numbers don't add up for global warming
- From: RichL
- Re: Numbers don't add up for global warming
- References:
- Re: Numbers don't add up for global warming
- From: RichL
- Re: Numbers don't add up for global warming
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: McSame a dangerous choice
- Next by Date: Re: OT: devin doesn't add up. His cheeks warming...
- Previous by thread: Re: Numbers don't add up for global warming
- Next by thread: Re: Numbers don't add up for global warming
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
