Re: OT: Global Warming - An interesting perspective


"Les Cargill" <lcargill@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:477c1c17$0$5109$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

With respect to AGW, where exactly do you go to "check"?

Well one way to start would be not rejecting any and all scientific
discussion about possible manmade climate change as if we *know* that it's
all bogus, agenda-driven fakery, i.e. that attitude that some folks here
take as if they're noted climatologists and can confidently dismiss any
lesser scientist who says otherwise. It's kind of hard to check when you've
decided in advance what the answer is and you disbelieve anything anyone
says that you don't want to believe.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: OT: Global Warming - An interesting perspective
    ... Les Cargill wrote: ... Well one way to start would be not rejecting any and all scientific ... discussion about possible manmade climate change as if we *know* that it's ... After all, to thwart Global Warming, all that is necessary is ...
    (alt.guitar.amps)
  • Re: OT: Global Warming - An interesting perspective
    ... DGDevin wrote: ... Well one way to start would be not rejecting any and all scientific discussion about possible manmade climate change as if we *know* that it's all bogus, agenda-driven fakery, i.e. that attitude that some folks here take as if they're noted climatologists and can confidently dismiss any lesser scientist who says otherwise. ... Congress is already banning incandescent bulbs. ...
    (alt.guitar.amps)