Re: Biasing JJ E34L valves

On Nov 14, 6:39 am, White Spirit <wspi...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Should I treat these as having 30W maximum plate dissipation? I put a
new matched set into my Marshall 6100 with static dissipation set
around 17.5W and they sound a bit cold, particularly on the clean
channel. I'm thinking I should aim for between 19.5 to 21W?

I would definitely push it to the hot side, the only time they sound
good is when they are hot. The crossover distortion should be
absent.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Biasing JJ E34L valves
    ... new matched set into my Marshall 6100 with static dissipation set ... I would definitely push it to the hot side, the only time they sound ... This amp WAS NOT engineered with this mode of operation in mind, ... That power amp is designed to be run clean. ...
    (alt.guitar.amps)
  • Re: Biasing JJ E34L valves
    ... new matched set into my Marshall 6100 with static dissipation set ... around 17.5W and they sound a bit cold, ... using an oscilloscope to check for crossover distortion (too cold) is ... but even with a scope it becomes necessary to bias the amp ...
    (alt.guitar.amps)
  • Re: Biasing JJ E34L valves
    ... new matched set into my Marshall 6100 with static dissipation set ... around 17.5W and they sound a bit cold, particularly on the clean ... channel. ...
    (alt.guitar.amps)
  • Re: Orange amplifier question
    ... Channel 1 has great clean tone and works just fine for my ... recent model Fender 12-string, and although the sound is clean ... Channel 2 is the boost channel, ...
    (alt.guitar.amps)
  • Re: Jim, Premier et. guys...heres a video of my JCM
    ... Clearly the most significant sound changing adjustment on this amp is the master volume, and that basically has three settings: under 2 clean, at 2 driven, past 5, more bass. ... Well the boost channel is different, ...
    (alt.guitar.amps)