Re: Recovered amp nets more than original?
- From: It's that guy again... <up.urs.con>
- Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 12:01:13 -0500
I'm sorry, but that looks like a rusted junk. I don't care how good it's 'MoJo'
may be sold to sound like, it's in nasty shape. To make that a useable, maybe
gig able amp, would cost alot more then it's MoJo is worth. Yes, it's rare, yes,
it should sound good, but it's in nasty shape. I would rather spend said $$ on
items worth fixing. I have a old 'PIG' Marshall Major. We're talking small panel,
real 'pig'. It was stolen from me, and I got it back. Chassis, faceplate & insides
are dead mint. Cab looks like shit. Will I re-cover it. You bet ya ass. WHY?
...it's one of 2 made in 'white/cream' covering, according to the Gov himself..
Some items are worth the $/effort. Some are not. I know people who think old
Plush is worth spending danger $$ to 'restore'. Why, I don't pretend to know.
JJTj
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
"Do I take LSD...na, I can paint better then that"
Don Van Vliet (Capt Beefheart)
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Recovered amp nets more than original?
- From: Stephen Cowell
- Re: Recovered amp nets more than original?
- References:
- Recovered amp nets more than original?
- From: Stephen Cowell
- Re: Recovered amp nets more than original?
- From: Naked
- Re: Recovered amp nets more than original?
- From: Stephen Cowell
- Recovered amp nets more than original?
- Prev by Date: Re: Recovered amp nets more than original?
- Next by Date: Re: Guitar Amp Repair Malaysia
- Previous by thread: Re: Recovered amp nets more than original?
- Next by thread: Re: Recovered amp nets more than original?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|