Re: The LIBS LIED - WMD found in Iraq
- From: Hank Gitmo <gitmo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 18:45:19 -0700
On 22 Jun 2006 15:57:09 -0700, "Mr Soul" <google@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Do post some evidence that those munitions were ineffective, and now SAFE.You're using your stupid nuancing technigues again. The WMDs were
DEGRADED - do you know what that means? Who knows if they're safe or
not and who cares?
Mr Soul
Uhm, degraded does not mean it turns into sugar to make candy for
Iraqi children. Read and learn:
Hundreds of chemical weapons found in Iraq: US intelligence
06-22-2006, 05h55
WASHINGTON (AFP)
Asked just how dangerous the weapons are, Hoekstra said: "One or two
of these shells, the materials inside of these, transferred outside of
the country, can be very, very deadly."
The report said that the purity of the chemical agents -- and thus
their potency -- depends on "many factors, including the manufacturing
process, potential additives, and environmental storage conditions."
"While agents degrade over time, chemical warfare agents remain
hazardous and potentially lethal," it said.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The LIBS LIED - WMD found in Iraq
- From: Mr Soul
- Re: The LIBS LIED - WMD found in Iraq
- References:
- The LIBS LIED - WMD found in Iraq
- From: Hank Gitmo
- Re: The LIBS LIED - WMD found in Iraq
- From: DGDevin
- Re: The LIBS LIED - WMD found in Iraq
- From: Dano
- Re: The LIBS LIED - WMD found in Iraq
- From: google
- Re: The LIBS LIED - WMD found in Iraq
- From: DGDevin
- Re: The LIBS LIED - WMD found in Iraq
- From: John Wheaton
- Re: The LIBS LIED - WMD found in Iraq
- From: Mr Soul
- The LIBS LIED - WMD found in Iraq
- Prev by Date: Re: The LIBS LIED - WMD found in Iraq
- Next by Date: 1st amp build: louder at volume 9 than 10... why?
- Previous by thread: Re: The LIBS LIED - WMD found in Iraq
- Next by thread: Re: The LIBS LIED - WMD found in Iraq
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|