Re: OT: Warning--our country is changing!

In article <e38dog$b8m$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
TPS <theron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> indignantly bleated:

"Claude V. Lucas" <claudel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4457a912$0$65513$742ec2ed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <e3887q$703$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
TPS <theron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"Claude V. Lucas" <claudel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4456a6ed$0$65512$742ec2ed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <_didnS-s6NKjPsvZRVn-sQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
The Repair Gurl <repairguy1993@xxxxxxxxx> mournfully bleated:

claudelle@xxxxxxxxx (Claudelle) wrote:

In article <9NOdneaV_cT89svZRVn-jA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
The Repair Gurl <repairguy1993@xxxxxxxxx> snivelled:

--snip--
If society is devolving towards selective obedience
of only the laws that one agrees with then what's next?
Where will the traitors hide when others decide to
ignore the laws against lynching, for example?

The white house?

I doubt if you can get in, but don't let that stop you
from trying.

Are you trying, in your fumble-fingered way, to say
I'm a traitor?

Well, let's see.

From dictionary.com...

traitor: One who betrays one's country, a cause, or a trust,
especially one who commits treason.


treason: the offense of attempting to overthrow the
government of one's country or of assisting its enemies in war;
specifically : the act of levying war against the United States
or adhering to or giving aid and comfort to its enemies by one
who owes it allegiance


If the (earth) shoe fits...


Nice. You *insinuate* the charge of treason, but (knowing that you can't
back it up), you don't have the balls to just come out and say it.



Do try and keep up. I know it can be difficult.

Mr. Gurl, in his fumble-fingered way, asked if I
was "trying to say that he was a traitor"

I merely provided the dictionary definition and
left it to Mr. Gurl to decide on his own if his
behavior fits the definition.

The same decision can be left up to all of you
left-wing haters of the current Admimistration.

My only comment is that I hope that the same
presumption of innocence offered *by* the left
regarding various accusations made against
Administration members is offered *to* the left
when the subject of treason arises.

Don't like it?

Good.


You still don't have the balls to come out and say it, I see.
I don't blame you. Your little dreams of pogroms against so-called traitors
will look truly ridiculous in print.
But, if you really think you've discovered a treasonous act, why don't you
stand up and notify the authorities so it can be prosecuted, rather than
issueing veiled threats on a newsgroup? Maybe you know that you don't have
a leg to stand on ...



Veiled Threats? Pogroms?

Have another bong hit...

Why are you so spun up over *my* opinion?

Feeling a bit guilty or something?

Whether or not *I* personally think someone
is engaging in treasonous behavior is not
really relevant unless I get called for jury duty.

Again, my point is that I hope that the same
presumption of innocence offered *by* the left
regarding various accusations made against
Administration members is offered *to* the left
when the subject of treason arises.

--
| ^ JOIN THE
| /"\ ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN
| \ / TO RID THE US OF
| X NATTERING FUCKWITS
| / \
.

Loading