Re: OT - Clinton was NOT offered Bin Laden by Sudan in 1996
- From: "John Wheaton" <wheatonjohn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 16:52:25 -0700
"Mr Soul" <google@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1145402924.999370.16870@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Where is the verification?No - you need to provide the link because it's you that is making the
Where is the LINK?
claims.
Why do you LIE so obviously?
DAYS ago I called on YOU to verify YOUR claim!
4/16/2006 3:20pm
"Mr Soul" <google@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1145226010.019649.264050@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The clause was not right above his signature, so please stop lying.
I asked you verify THAT claim, and you have NOT.
Anyone reading this, who is interested, can find the
sagreement.
YOU amde the claim. and I asked you to verify it as proper netiquette
requires the ball is in your court. You have NOT verified your claim from
DAYS ago.
I have the agreement on my computer
Proper nettiquette requires that YOU verify YOUR claim with clips and LINKS.
& I refer to it
regularly when I'm proving that you are wrong.
You haven't the BALLS to ever step up and attempt any such thing! Too funny!
4/16/2006 3:20pm
"Mr Soul" <google@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1145226010.019649.264050@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The clause was not right above his signature, so please stop lying.
I asked you verify THAT claim, and you have NOT.
I asked you verify THAT claim, and you have NOT.Yes I have.
Not yet.
I qouted the page & the actual clause above the
signatures. I am right.
YOU CAUGHT YOUR OWN LIE!
This started days ago with me stating that Al Franken signed under the
clause "I have read and understand"
You later TRIED to LIE and state that his signature was NOT under that
clause, and now YOU ADMIT that Franken DID SIGN under the clause!
YOU CAUGHT YOURSELF!
Thank you for proving your DISHONESTY!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: OT - Clinton was NOT offered Bin Laden by Sudan in 1996
- From: Mr Soul
- Re: OT - Clinton was NOT offered Bin Laden by Sudan in 1996
- From: John Wheaton
- Re: OT - Clinton was NOT offered Bin Laden by Sudan in 1996
- From: Mr Soul
- Re: OT - Clinton was NOT offered Bin Laden by Sudan in 1996
- From: John Wheaton
- Re: OT - Clinton was NOT offered Bin Laden by Sudan in 1996
- From: Mr Soul
- Re: OT - Clinton was NOT offered Bin Laden by Sudan in 1996
- From: John Wheaton
- Re: OT - Clinton was NOT offered Bin Laden by Sudan in 1996
- From: Mr Soul
- Re: OT - Clinton was NOT offered Bin Laden by Sudan in 1996
- From: John Wheaton
- Re: OT - Clinton was NOT offered Bin Laden by Sudan in 1996
- From: Mr Soul
- Re: OT - Clinton was NOT offered Bin Laden by Sudan in 1996
- From: John Wheaton
- Re: OT - Clinton was NOT offered Bin Laden by Sudan in 1996
- From: Mr Soul
- Re: OT - Clinton was NOT offered Bin Laden by Sudan in 1996
- From: John Wheaton
- Re: OT - Clinton was NOT offered Bin Laden by Sudan in 1996
- From: Mr Soul
- Re: OT - Clinton was NOT offered Bin Laden by Sudan in 1996
- From: John Wheaton
- Re: OT - Clinton was NOT offered Bin Laden by Sudan in 1996
- From: Mr Soul
- Re: OT - Clinton was NOT offered Bin Laden by Sudan in 1996
- From: John Wheaton
- Re: OT - Clinton was NOT offered Bin Laden by Sudan in 1996
- From: Mr Soul
- Re: OT - Clinton was NOT offered Bin Laden by Sudan in 1996
- Prev by Date: Re: Why war is insane and stupid
- Next by Date: Re: OT - Clinton was NOT offered Bin Laden by Sudan in 1996
- Previous by thread: Re: OT - Clinton was NOT offered Bin Laden by Sudan in 1996
- Next by thread: Re: OT - Clinton was NOT offered Bin Laden by Sudan in 1996
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|