Re: OT: Just for Soul, actual facts on Global Warming read it all if you can




"Rich Koerner" <richk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:43FA9C6D.87049F12@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


"playon@xxxxxxxxxxxx" wrote:

On Sat, 18 Feb 2006 08:06:21 -0500, Rich Koerner <richk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

What part of E=mc^ do they not understand.

Did you read the rebuttal... she is extremely suspect as an unbiased
source... and in addition, an Astrophyicist, not a cimate expert.

An Astrophysicist uses the laws of physical world to explain things.

The so called climate EXPERT, plays with *COMPUTER MODELS*, based on
guesses, to explain things.

The computer models are useless without the known laws of physics applied
where energy is
concerned. Which, comes from the sun. Or, haven't you noticed.

So, when the computer geeks in the weather forecasting business employ the
basic laws of physics,
where energy is concerned, maybe they will have something of merit with
their computer models. Till
then, the use of their *computer models* as a crystal ball, is only an
attempt at a new modern field
I would call Scientific Clairvoyance.

The track record of this new field of Scientific Clairvoyance, has been
more in error than being
correct in it's predictions on global warming thus far. Prediction of a
30 day weather forcast with
any accuracy is impossible still. Yet, I'm expected to believe their long
range global warnings as
accurate. Don't make me laugh. The phychic hotline predictions run
parallel, with the same lack of
accuracy in their predictions. Which, are no better than the opinion
polls on such.

When those who practice the fundimentals of Modern Physics, that gave us
the likes of Einstine and
others, step forward with more than the chicken little clairvoyance camp,
I'll be paying attention.

Till then, it makes good subject matter, for AGA entertainment.



Green/Pace wrote:

Even "simple" explanations are way over their heads, there Rich.



Yeah, it's just the product of the TV generation.

And, the internet generation isn't any better either.

Everyone is an expert on the internet with their web sites.

LOL, if it's on the web, it must be so.

What crakes me up, is they all sit in their little boxes, all nice and neat, and to the death they
defend their internet reality, from the real one they can not see or understand.

Rather than to study the physical world they live in, they create their own fantacy reality of this
place they exist in. Instead of looking to the stars on a clear night, they sit at computers on the
internet.

All it takes to understand what is going on, is to get the hell out of the house, and experience at
the sun.

Realize everything IS of the sun. It is our everything. Yet, we are a speck in the light of the
sun, and cast little for a shadow. Yes, we are at the mercy of the majesty of the sun, and are as
powerless as the grain of sand on the sea shore that we are.

Likewise, with the earth, we are as powerless.

It is pure folly to think that the speck of man could influence such magnatudes to any degree.




Regards,

Rich Koerner,
Time Electronics.
http://www.timeelect.com

Specialists in Live Sound FOH Engineering,
Music & Studio Production,
Vintage Instruments, and Tube Amplifiers
.

Relevant Pages

  • Just when you think they got a handle on it, this happens...
    ... It's a mystery that presented itself unexpectedly: The radioactive decay of some elements sitting quietly in laboratories on Earth seemed to be influenced by activities inside the sun, ... There is even an outside chance that this unexpected effect is brought about by a previously unknown particle emitted by the sun. "That would be truly remarkable," said Peter Sturrock, Stanford professor emeritus of applied physics and an expert on the inner workings of the sun. ... "Everyone thought it must be due to experimental mistakes, because we're all brought up to believe that decay rates are constant," Sturrock said. ...
    (rec.gambling.poker)
  • Re: Here is your chance to learn a little science [for some of you,
    ... Biology 1: Multiplication in biology means reproduction, ... in physics and mathematics is a lack of symmetry. ... if there were no Sun there would be no light ... A growth factor or growth hormone controls the growth of an organism. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Time
    ... constant, and physics would collapse. ... would either bake the earth or cause the sun to stop working. ... revolves around the Sun. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Boikat learns the hard way that Stellar Parallax is IDENTICAL
    ... passing close to the sun. ... including hundreds of other solar systems in which the planets orbit around ... But not if you have to reject Newtonian physics in order to produce the ... use whatever point you like as the origin of the coordinate system ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: OT - A Modest Proposal
    ... "What happens to the sun when it rains?". ... Ignorance of physics is ignorance of the driving ...
    (rec.outdoors.rv-travel)