Re: What if Hillary's fake to the Right fools the wrong side?


"Fearless Freep" <freep@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:UA4Ge.746$8y3.57@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "TPS" <theron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:dc98qt$7fq$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> "Lars Overshank" <lars@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:1122510001.138421.256950@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> Check out the dailykos or
>>>> the Campaign for America's Future webpages, and see what they say about
>>>> the
>>>> DLC and Clinton.
>>>
>>> That's funny, I was going to suggest that YOU do that. But I think
>>> Hillary would lose almost as much now if she DID distance herself from
>>> the DLC in response. It'll make her look weak, and led around by her
>>> extremist supporters, and that wouldn't exactly play well for her. Put
>>> another way: like him or hate him, *Bush* wouldn't. And that's why
>>> Hillary can't, now, either.
>>>
>>> Lars
>>>
>>
>>
>> True enough. She almost certainly won't back off from her affiliation
>> with DLC. She'll want to at least appear to change the way they do
>> business, to be a "uniter, not a divider" (heh).
>>
>>
>> BTW, here's what the DailyKos says about Hil:
>> A few words about the DLC meeting Kos (and the rest of the blogging
>> planet, and the entire press, and the entire GOP machine) referenced
>> yesterday.
>>
>> I come neither to bury the DLC, nor to praise them. And in truth, I am
>> utterly opinionless on who should get the nomination for the next
>> presidential election -- it's not that I'm uninformed; it's just that I
>> really don't, six months into the current presidential term, give a
>> tinker's damn, and I don't particularly think anyone else should either.
>> In the next few years, I will personally come to support whoever
>> accomplishes the most -- or, given the current climate, anything --
>> towards actual Democratic objectives. You want to be a leader? Then show
>> me you can lead. It's that simple.
>
> Sounds like somebody is being careful not to burn any bridges. Coward. He
> doesn't want any powerful enemies. "Utterly opinionless"... yeah, sure. So
> what good is he as a blogger, anyway?
>
> Freep
>
>


How incredibly paranoid.
A writer decides to be circumspect and not jump to conclusions, and you
proclaim him a coward? Afraid of making enemies? No wonder you enjoy
reactionary media and politicians.


.