Re: The POWs in Guantanamo Bay


"timepixdc" <timepixdc@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message >
>> So you are maintaining that you are right, and the Supreme Court is
>> wrong?
>
You maintain the YOU are correct and the CURRENT Supreme Court was wrong in
the 2004 decision in the Hamdi v. Rumsfeld case?

Bye,
John


.

Relevant Pages

  • The Democratic Party: Hypocrisy and Revisionism
    ... Kerry is demanding that the White House release Supreme Court nominee ... John Roberts' records in total. ...
    (soc.retirement)
  • Re: OT--Heres one bill that will never pass
    ... > Pick anyone not in your mirror, Harry. ... Supreme Court decision involving eminent domain. ... house is," Dean said, not mentioning that until he nominated John Roberts to ... Associate Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas. ...
    (rec.boats)
  • Re: OT - Things to Ponder...
    ... Once Upon a Midnight Dreary, While John Oliver Pondered, Weak and ... Given that the Supreme Court stopped the recount, ... proceeding, Bush was losing ground (down to a 157 vote lead, from the ...
    (rec.arts.mystery)
  • Re: Weirdest Moment in Lennons Playboy Interview
    ... Because it is well known that John contradicted himself often. ... I'm not talking about Yoko being hurt. ... Supreme Court (which, IIRC relies on the First Amendment of the U.S. ... other words, under US Supreme Court case law, character assassination ...
    (rec.music.beatles)
  • OT: Rehnquist has died
    ... evening at his home in suburban Virginia, said Supreme Court ... spokeswoman Kathy Arberg. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (alt.religion.islam)