Re: Is this computer any good for CS4?

"Alan Browne" <alan.browne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:AoGdnRW2lL522VzXnZ2dnUVZ_oNi4p2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
dvus wrote:
"Alan Browne" <alan.browne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:uPidnW3Vco0LuVzXnZ2dnUVZ_o5i4p2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
dvus wrote:
"Paul Burdett" <pburdett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:4ac07681$0$1783$afc38c87@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"Mike Russell" <groupsRE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:tohoxuki5h6p$.dlg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Sun, 27 Sep 2009 08:34:02 -0400, Alan Browne wrote:

Mike Russell wrote:
On Sat, 26 Sep 2009 15:13:41 -0400, Alan Browne wrote:

Paul Burdett wrote:

Thanks for the replies..much appreciated. As for the price..you may be
right, but most quad core systems I've looked at are around the $1600 mark.
I'll look into the Windows 7 OS as well.
Paul
Mac - G5 supports 1 or 2 Quad core Xeon Nehalem (same i7
microarchitecture) for 8 to 16 simultaneous threads. Real parallel
processing.

To support that Mac OS X 10.6 has a multithread dispatching scheme (GCD)
that will blow Windows out of the water as apps catch up to it - and I
suspect PS CS5 will for complex image editing.

The whole notion of GCD is take parallel processing details out of the
hands of apps developers and simply drop their tasks/threads to GCD to
manage which core executes what. This means balanced/loaded processing.

i7 under Windows 7 sounds promising, but Mac is where it will be at.

64 bit no workee

Mac OS X 10.6 64 bit workee.

Sure - the OS supports 64 bits, but not Photoshop.

And CS5 definitely workee 64 bit.

It does, but it's not released yet. 64 bit CS4 was released a full year
or more, on windows.

(A G5 is way over his budget however).

His budget, and a lot of other folks'.

I'm not seeing any advantages here.

Hi Mike,
I've been reading this newsgroup for a while and I value your opinion. I have CS3 Extended (legal and paid for in case anyone wants to know) and it worked reasonably fast on my Pentium 4, 3GHZ desktop with 2Gb ram with no internet access. Since getting rid of my old desktop internet machine due to old age, I now have only the one PC and laptop (Toshiba Satellite Core duo...which runs CS3 faster of course and CS4 (trial) worked quite fast as well). My PC is now much slower and Bridge especially takes too long to display the thumbnails...opening a single raw file in Camera Raw also seems to take too long (20 secs or so sometimes accompanied by the "reading raw data" progress bar on the screen. Rebooting generally helps. Of course I do have antivirus (AVG) running as well.
My question is I've heard that Intel's new core i7 is very fast (faster than quad core) and windows 7 os is also a very good. I do quite a bit of editing in Photoshop, so I'm looking to upgrade my computer as well as perhaps upgrading to CS4. As CS5 is expected out soon I'm wondering if the i7+windows 7 os+ 64bit CS4 or 5 will be the best choice if I want photoshop to really work fast? I do have a budget (approx AUD$2000), but would rather spend more now than get a cheaper system and have to upgrade in 12 months.
Your advice is appreciated.


My .02 is that I'd make sure I got win7 (it's faster than Vista, and many new machines include a free upgrade path), get an I7 rig and not settle for less than an nVidia 9800 (which you can get reasonably with an additional Gig of video memory). The Macs are ok but pricey for what you get.

Yeah, what you get, with say an iMac 24" is a display that a Windblow user has to pay $800 for.

Well, that's not really true. 24" displays are much cheaper than that nowadays, less than $300.

Not at the quality of an iMac display. It's another world.


Probably not a discussion anyone will win.

--
dvus

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The Windiots/Wintrolls/WinNuts are getting frisky...
    ... and and Linux distributions and more choices for hardware. ... tailor a system to suit their needs easier than you can a Mac. ... Those who use Windows regularly, and remain with Windows when they don't have ... connector with your old Apple Studio Display when you upgrade to a new Apple? ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: Microsoft seeks patent for office spy software
    ... INSTALL LINUX AND USE OPEN OFFICE!!1! ... At least do us all a favor and don't use Mac. ... You have never once given a *valid* deficiency for either mac or linux other than you can't use your windows software on them. ... when they upgrade the OS they preserve backwards compatibility. ...
    (alt.2600)
  • Re: New iMacs offer more value than competition - report
    ... You can, for instance, select the highest-spec PC available at a specific price point, and compare to the Mac available at that price point. ... Many Mac users upgrade their OS. ... The version before that gets *nothing*, and Apple has been pushing new versions of OS X rather quicker than MS has Windows, to boot. ... If this were OS X, they'd be saying "OX Tiger has no protected mode, no Glass, and weaker NX support, so we can't do Chrome on it". ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: OT - Upgrading Computers
    ... I am interested in hearing how you decide when it is time to upgrade ... Having had computers since the time of DOS, ... Windows, and I still do on a daily basis on one of my computers. ... Desktop for the Mac, which allows me to run still needed Windows ...
    (rec.crafts.metalworking)
  • Re: AnandTech likes the Mac Pro
    ... for a 'quad core' workstation (given that Windows doesn't scale well ... even to dual cores, let alone quad cores). ... CSMA and mac universe is fluffcake territory. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)