Re: Working at 8 / 16 / 32 bits per channel...
- From: John J <nohj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 10:29:50 -0500
erpy wrote:
That is (also) why professional photographers shoot and edit raw images... because you can re-edit again and again without perceivable loss of data and precision.
A competent professional doesn't have to edit in such a manner. He/she knows how to do it right in-camera.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: Working at 8 / 16 / 32 bits per channel...
- From: erpy
- Re: Working at 8 / 16 / 32 bits per channel...
- From: Mike Russell
- Re: Working at 8 / 16 / 32 bits per channel...
- From: erpy
- Re: Working at 8 / 16 / 32 bits per channel...
- From: Mike Russell
- Re: Working at 8 / 16 / 32 bits per channel...
- From: erpy
- Re: Working at 8 / 16 / 32 bits per channel...
- From: Mike Russell
- Re: Working at 8 / 16 / 32 bits per channel...
- From: Mike Russell
- Re: Working at 8 / 16 / 32 bits per channel...
- From: erpy
- Re: Working at 8 / 16 / 32 bits per channel...
- From: John J
- Re: Working at 8 / 16 / 32 bits per channel...
- From: erpy
- Re: Working at 8 / 16 / 32 bits per channel...
- From: John J
- Re: Working at 8 / 16 / 32 bits per channel...
- From: erpy
- Re: Working at 8 / 16 / 32 bits per channel...
- Prev by Date: Re: Working at 8 / 16 / 32 bits per channel...
- Next by Date: Re: Working at 8 / 16 / 32 bits per channel...
- Previous by thread: Re: Working at 8 / 16 / 32 bits per channel...
- Next by thread: Re: Working at 8 / 16 / 32 bits per channel...
- Index(es):