Re: Working at 8 / 16 / 32 bits per channel...
- From: Mike Russell <groupsRE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:53:07 -0700
On Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:50:11 -0500, John J wrote:
How in the world can we bring real photographs to the digital table?
This is an entirely impoverished format.
Links to a web page, I guess. Or do you mean "real" as in cow hoofs and
silver?
--
Mike Russell - http://www.curvemeister.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Working at 8 / 16 / 32 bits per channel...
- From: Talker
- Re: Working at 8 / 16 / 32 bits per channel...
- References:
- Re: Working at 8 / 16 / 32 bits per channel...
- From: Robert Barnett
- Re: Working at 8 / 16 / 32 bits per channel...
- From: mike
- Re: Working at 8 / 16 / 32 bits per channel...
- From: John J
- Re: Working at 8 / 16 / 32 bits per channel...
- From: Robert Barnett
- Re: Working at 8 / 16 / 32 bits per channel...
- From: John J
- Re: Working at 8 / 16 / 32 bits per channel...
- From: John J
- Re: Working at 8 / 16 / 32 bits per channel...
- From: Mike Russell
- Re: Working at 8 / 16 / 32 bits per channel...
- From: John J
- Re: Working at 8 / 16 / 32 bits per channel...
- Prev by Date: Re: Working at 8 / 16 / 32 bits per channel...
- Next by Date: Re: Working at 8 / 16 / 32 bits per channel...
- Previous by thread: Re: Working at 8 / 16 / 32 bits per channel...
- Next by thread: Re: Working at 8 / 16 / 32 bits per channel...
- Index(es):