Re: Working at 8 / 16 / 32 bits per channel...
- From: John Passaneau <jxp16@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 09:35:32 -0400
Another "Close is good enough"?
It is if your producing photographs. Maybe not if your producing pixels.
John Passaneau
.
- References:
- Re: Working at 8 / 16 / 32 bits per channel...
- From: Robert Barnett
- Re: Working at 8 / 16 / 32 bits per channel...
- From: mike
- Re: Working at 8 / 16 / 32 bits per channel...
- From: John J
- Re: Working at 8 / 16 / 32 bits per channel...
- From: Robert Barnett
- Re: Working at 8 / 16 / 32 bits per channel...
- From: John J
- Re: Working at 8 / 16 / 32 bits per channel...
- Prev by Date: Re: Working at 8 / 16 / 32 bits per channel...
- Next by Date: looking for a photo of Vogue magazine and Playboy magazine
- Previous by thread: Re: Working at 8 / 16 / 32 bits per channel...
- Next by thread: Re: Working at 8 / 16 / 32 bits per channel...
- Index(es):
