Re: Raw v. Tiff



On Mon, 26 May 2008 11:42:02 +1000, dorayme <doraymeRidThis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Someone had a Nikon digital at a function I attended yesterday. Very
nice and all, I notice it had a "Raw" format as well as "Tiff". What is
the advantage of Raw over Tiff? (I know two disadvantages, not all
computers can read Raw but most can read Tiff. And Raw is even bigger in
file size to Tiff.)


If you want the in camera software to do the processing for you, use TIFF. If you want to be in
control of the entire process, use RAW.
In my camera (not Nikon) , TIFF files are far larger than RAW.
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: weird posts
    ... chunk of film. ... about a 635MB TIFF file. ... and there is no loss from either the RAW or the conversion. ... But Nikon and others allow you to SHOOT TIFF files. ...
    (rec.photo.equipment.35mm)
  • Re: Compression in JPEG files in digital cameras
    ... I stand/sit corrected, Thomas! ... I just tried an LZW TIFF from PSP ... know what to do with 16-bit, much less RAW. ... advanced amateurs to pros, with all types and prices of cameras, ...
    (rec.photo.digital)
  • Re: File formats
    ... When I use the TIFF format in the camera, ... Does that mean that the TIFF format is better, ... I have always thought that the RAW format is best... ... RAW files have the raw image data as taken off the sensor, at 12 bits per pixel. ...
    (rec.photo.digital.slr-systems)
  • Re: Raw v. Tiff
    ... computers can read Raw but most can read Tiff. ... The RAW picture means that all of the information that was ... processed in the TIFF image is not processed in any way. ...
    (alt.graphics.photoshop)
  • Re: Raw v. Tiff
    ... computers can read Raw but most can read Tiff. ... The RAW picture means that all of the information that was ... processed in the TIFF image is not processed in any way. ...
    (alt.graphics.photoshop)