Re: Another resize/image quality question
- From: tacit <tacitr@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 17:17:50 GMT
In article <hfFrf.107036$V7.1380@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
anonomous individual <only.reply@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Digital images are mathematical creations which can have the same
> mathematics applied to them as created them in the first place. The
> physics of enlarging photographs is unchanged.
Wrong.
Digital images have a fixed amount of information in them, which is
determined by the number of pixels. Each pixel is a solid color; no
sub-pixel information exists in the image.
They are not made "mathematically." When a digital image is enlarged, it
still contains the same amount of information. No new information is
added. No new information exists. The same amount of information is
spread over a larger number of pixels, that's all.
Some non-critical viewers who do not know how to evaluate image quality
are fooled if the resulting upsampled image is over-sharpened; they do
not know how to see the results of the interpolation, that's all.
--
Art, photography, shareware, polyamory, literature, kink:
all at http://www.xeromag.com/franklin.html
.
- References:
- Another resize/image quality question
- From: dvwool
- Re: Another resize/image quality question
- From: dvwool
- Re: Another resize/image quality question
- From: Jim Hargan
- Re: Another resize/image quality question
- From: anonomous individual
- Re: Another resize/image quality question
- From: Jim Hargan
- Re: Another resize/image quality question
- From: anonomous individual
- Another resize/image quality question
- Prev by Date: Re: Another resize/image quality question
- Next by Date: Re: Another resize/image quality question
- Previous by thread: Re: Another resize/image quality question
- Next by thread: Re: Another resize/image quality question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|