Re: Vision Council?

On Jul 12, 8:07 am, HairTheory <Veggy...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jul 12, 9:03 am, spiritrising <miketwofeath...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Jul 11, 7:48 pm, Steph Gonzales <mrs.sgonzales...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

So where?
Lets just all go back to Colorado, where it all began to begin again
in the new age of aquarius :)

well it didn't begin in colorado so try again.

vuk u

peace holy,
sat in on pennsylvania vision council, missed about 1st 15 minutes,
for it moved to shade at noon when noon is when it starts, so not only
was i late, i had to find it, something usually not done, move vision
council from beginning when weather is ok to begin council. usually
not moved to shade till its been at main circle for a while, asto the
several vision councils attended & discussed in circle when hot
outside & people wanted right away to move in shade.

for those whom weren't there or forgot some of what took place at
pennsylvania vision council, it would of ended in a few hours if it
weren't for a fellow standing up for south dakota whom claims he has
been living there for about 10 years & scouted the area out & resolved
native problems we hear & read about that stops us from gathering
there on national forest land for national gathering july 4th
celibration.

he finally agreed to stop blocking washington this year after it was
explained to him, that most people wanted washington next year, & that
will he end his block if the following year south dakota was chosen &
approved at next vision council at washington. thats how i witnessed
it being almost across from him in circle, some 145 degrees away, so
the circle was big enough that errors & others had a some different
witness of the event. he thought south dakota was being attacked by
some people at council it seems or of that nature.

he said the myth of indians or natives not wanting us there he
dismissed with enough verbal evidence no one challenged him anymore
concerning the rumors being truth of rainbows should keep away from
that area cause natives don't want us there!

just what are you people if your not a native? weren't you born in the
u.s.a., or else are you all from some different continent come here
trying to be established through rainbow gatherings or whatever?

i surely see you all as a native if your born on earth from a mother,
its just earth is big & one can't specialize in all its reality as a
human, thats why humanity exists to help do so. humanity some 7
billion of you or i's, that can deal more healthily with more stuff
going on on earth then just one person could, right!

anyways the fellow i wonder if he is there at this years vision
council, it be a pity if he wasn't, for he did such a good job of
convincing it seemed everyone that south dakota was searched out by
him, & that a viable place or places exist for a national with happy i
assume local natives concerning this, once they the so called local
natives whom i assume are the people whom ages ago came from the west
to settle in america, the western hemisphere, whereas most of people
today traveled from the east to settle here, then there is local
natives whom are just naturalized of where they live & grew up,
following traditions of the area past down from their parents &
parents associates, like what you find anywhere whom appear to not
like tourist & people not from their area, cause of their ignorance of
the area & whats sacred to the local natives there! i called local
natives, locals in that case. but maybe others mean something else
then i'm trying to communicate asto types of people, humans, etc....

he sure showed us he vanquished all these problems that here in the
welcomehome internet site is mentioned again, as though they didn't
hear him or weren't there or forgot what he told everyone.

he made south dakota look like a winner now to attend!

but i don't recall in detail the snow problem being addressed existing
there in south dakota, though it seems it was addressed, for its a
drier area then washinton, right? washington is known for its wetness,
so lots of snow can happen as seen there at lower elevations.

"about having to deal with snow again is like asking too much".

snow comes & goes year by year asto amounts, this was an extra heavy
snow year out west after about 10 years of light snow, so one hopes
for those growing crops out west for heavy snows again whom depend on
melting snow into reservoirs over the months to feed the peoples
needs. till a better way happens!

anyone recall exactly what it is that is so precious in south dakota
that we again need to pay heed to someone posting about tresspassing a
sacred site that maybe some tragicness could befall us like the earth
opening up & swallowing those up whom profane the sacred area by being
there, like the word that we read about in biblical scriptures of the
hebrew people whom constantly were destroyed for profaning sacred
areas & agreements etc... along with outsiders whom were doing the
same. recall moses was asked to remove his sandals cause the ground
was sacred he was about to walk on, & the hebrews feared to approach
the site of the terribleness revealed there before themselves. but
that terribleness led them out of slavery they been in for 400 years
in a foriegn continent.

sure lets run to where we haven't been yet, i love it, nature is so
pure in places one is blessed just being there a few days or less at
times, sometimes just passing by as has happened to me near
yellowstone once before, passing by in a bus healing poured out of the
rock formations & healed me within, my midsection with a sacred
healing yellow light that passed through the moving bus twice in about
an hour, & i didn't even know i needed healing there, or forgot i was
hit with a baseball bat there as a child & was hospitalized for 8 days
telling me i had a ruptured liver.

so i don't want to mess up any healing area for anyone, that could
include me sometimes, so if you know of why south dakota should be
avoided please speak up. for those words said about there is enough to
try to put fear in one if they try to approach the area including the
national forest that is already present for public utilization of
camping for a time there.

usually sacred sites are set aside from the rest of the national
forest like on indian reservations, state landmarks, etc... but
unknown sacred sites or forgotton ones are good enough to bring up
when monitering timber harvest plans (thp's) on corporate & private
property, & i assume national forest lands when the public has about 2
weeks to comment on the thp asto why logging should be prohibited at
that location of the thp, that public comment is at times good enough
to stop the whole thp till resolved such as not cutting within a 5
mile radius of the location or whatever terms is agreed upon that
could even stop the whole thp forever.

so i ask again concerning these sacred sites or site in south dakota,
even if its been resolved that its ok to gather there now, what does
south dakota have that has been suppressed asto going there. is it
like an old ancient indian site from b.c. that aliens landed as flying
horses that had arms that carried a bow that shot buffalo with metal
arrows now artifacts hidden away made out of some strange metal
detected on meteorities that picked on range horses, or some story
that goes like that, causing natives not to be able to hunt buffalo on
horses so the buffalo proliferated till not even deer had food to eat
anymore, so the watchers over the planet set these warrior horses like
pegasus to allow diversified species to exist otherwise today only
buffalo life would be known on earth even asto us asto what bodies
we'd of have today to abide on earth with.

peace holy
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Vision Council?
    ... will he end his block if the following year south dakota was chosen & ... he said the myth of indians or natives not wanting us there he ... so lots of snow can happen as seen there at lower elevations. ... unknown sacred sites or forgotton ones are good enough to bring up ...
    (alt.gathering.rainbow)
  • Re: Vision Council?
    ... will he end his block if the following year south dakota was chosen & ... he said the myth of indians or natives not wanting us there he ... so lots of snow can happen as seen there at lower elevations. ... unknown sacred sites or forgotton ones are good enough to bring up ...
    (alt.gathering.rainbow)
  • Re: Vision Council?
    ... weren't for a fellow standing up for south dakota whom claims he has ... he said the myth of indians or natives not wanting us there he ... so lots of snow can happen as seen there at lower elevations. ... unknown sacred sites or forgotton ones are good enough to bring up ...
    (alt.gathering.rainbow)
  • Re: Vision Council?
    ... sat in on pennsylvania vision council, missed about 1st 15 minutes, ... will he end his block if the following year south dakota was chosen & ... he said the myth of indians or natives not wanting us there he ... so lots of snow can happen as seen there at lower elevations. ...
    (alt.gathering.rainbow)