Re: egalitarian NOT patriarchal: was/Re: "rebel camp"
- From: Traveler <rascal_51@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 17:26:12 -0800 (PST)
On Feb 22, 5:56 pm, Sanity RE <sanity-cla...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 22, 4:08 pm, Traveler <rascal...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<snip-age>
I was just correcting the misrepresentation of fact in your reference
Yeah okay right sure fine.
I stand by what I said: "The Nazi's intent was manifestly NEVER
'peaceable assembly'!" the stuff you sent says peaceable assembly
wasn't ever their stated intent... Go split a hair, and do get your
thumb in the way!
They weren't barred - their first amendment rights were up held.
Plonk, You ain't worth it tonight
Old Tom
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: egalitarian NOT patriarchal: was/Re: "rebel camp"
- From: Sanity RE
- Re: egalitarian NOT patriarchal: was/Re: "rebel camp"
- References:
- "rebel camp"
- From: rainbowcrystalkitchen
- Re: egalitarian NOT patriarchal: was/Re: "rebel camp"
- From: Sanity RE
- Re: egalitarian NOT patriarchal: was/Re: "rebel camp"
- From: Woodchuck
- Re: egalitarian NOT patriarchal: was/Re: "rebel camp"
- From: Sanity RE
- Re: egalitarian NOT patriarchal: was/Re: "rebel camp"
- From: Woodchuck
- Re: egalitarian NOT patriarchal: was/Re: "rebel camp"
- From: Sanity RE
- Re: egalitarian NOT patriarchal: was/Re: "rebel camp"
- From: Woodchuck
- Re: egalitarian NOT patriarchal: was/Re: "rebel camp"
- From: Sanity RE
- Re: egalitarian NOT patriarchal: was/Re: "rebel camp"
- From: Traveler
- Re: egalitarian NOT patriarchal: was/Re: "rebel camp"
- From: Sanity RE
- Re: egalitarian NOT patriarchal: was/Re: "rebel camp"
- From: Traveler
- Re: egalitarian NOT patriarchal: was/Re: "rebel camp"
- From: Sanity RE
- "rebel camp"
- Prev by Date: Re: egalitarian NOT patriarchal
- Next by Date: Re: NM PUBLIC NOTICE:
- Previous by thread: Re: egalitarian NOT patriarchal: was/Re: "rebel camp"
- Next by thread: Re: egalitarian NOT patriarchal: was/Re: "rebel camp"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading