Re: The story.... according to Ohlooney and a stalker

On Jan 7, 1:34 am, bishop...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Jan 6, 11:41 pm, bishop...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:





On Nov 25 2008, 9:53 pm, "ohloo...@xxxxxxxxxxx" <ohloo...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

On Nov 25, 4:27 pm, Tha Billdozer <thabilldo...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

OK, so this friend of mine that I have known since 1984 went through
some hard times....

Lie number one - you have no friends.  Actually the title of your post
is even a lie as it tries to make a case that *I* even knew the
story.  The only thing I was contacted about was you once again posing
as a sort of legal expert, something folks on this group are well
acquainted with.  Oh.. I forgot that you have that certification in
Colorado, the state that requires no such certification.  ROFLMAO!!!

she was living in Somerville in 1999 with her then

*** Boring details snipped ***

I don't care about her story... I was only emailed regarding you and I
gave my honest opinion as always.

At which time one of the roommates, Paul Mudgett, willingly and
knowingly loaned her $800.... why ??

Maybe he loaned it out of the goodness of his heart, like Kevin
Milliways loaned you money that you have yet to pay back.  Deadbeats
of a feather flock together too, it seems.

he will not answer that question.....

Nor is he obligated to answer it for you.  What does it matter
legally?  He loaned it, she never paid it back.  It seems pretty clear-
cut to me.

And he was not nice about contacting her.... in fact threatened her
with legal action, threatened to damage her vehicle, threatened to
(and actually did) contact her employer, and threatened to (and
actually did) contact all of her friends (and co-workers) on Face
Book.

You should know about threats... you've been doing it here for
years.   Afraid you have competition in the threat department?  It's
said we most despise others who we see ourselves in.

Why ?? all over $800 he knowingly and willingly loaned her 10 years
ago.

Does a "willing" loan absolve the recipient from obligation?
Apparently you think so since you still haven't paid Kevin the money
back that he "willingly" loaned you.

Are any loans unwilling?  That would be theft as I see it.

So, she came to me as one of her oldest and dearest friends and asked
for my advice.

Word has it that you represented yourself in a legal capacity and that
you were throwing around your fake paralegal certification.   We all
got a good chuckle here about that.  Thanks for being the tool that
you are!

My advice: do not pay him one thin dime

I'm sure, since you have shown that you do not honour your debts.

and contact her local DA and Ploice.... and .

Yep... the rat approach, which you have shown to be a big fan of.

Well, she did exactly that.... as did I.

Of course you did... even though this did not involve you, your rodent
heritage prevented you from doing anything but sniffing out the cops
like the rat you are.

Now you cry because this person has targeted you...  funny.   We
chuckle again.

He then started harassing me and threatening me... as many have found
out this is not a route to take with me.

But for comedy value, it is definitely the route to take.  We look
forward to reading the drama unfold.  Thank you in advance.

What Paul Mudgett did not know was just how connected I really am.

Delusion of grandeur noted.  Lest we forget, it was not long ago you
were living in a stolen tent, leeching electricity from a house with a
"borrowed" power cord and shitting in buckets.  Yea, you sound really
connected to me!

He threatened to contact my employer, my landlord, and people on my
MySpace page.... which he never did.

I guess he is a better man than you are...

If Paul Mudgett wants he money he will have to file a civil case in
court.... period, end of story.

BUT, when a judge is handed the emails he has sent to this woman and
myself over the past month I doubt he will get anything.

Why not?  He is still owed that money.  Does his behavior absolve her
of her debt?
Apples and oranges...

Had Paul Mudgett actually approached the situation a little better.....
hell, a lot better, he would have his money right now and this would
all be over.

How one approaches the situation doesn't matter.  A person owes a
debt, they should pay that debt.  I guess you feel that paying off
your debts is contingent on the behaviour of the person loaning the
money.  This is typical with deadbeats and people who choose not to
take responsibility.. they can always find a reason to not pay their
debts.  It's never their fault but always the other person's.  Sorry,
your "friend" should have handled the situation better also.  It
sounds to me like both parties haven't gone about this in the right
way.

Here is how he should have approached it:

Hey Now,

How's it going ?? have not seen you in some time and wanted to know if
everything was alright with you ?? was wanting also to touch base on
that $800 I loaned you and was wondering if we could somehow get
together and work on a payment schedule.

But alas, this is not how he went about it.

This is a gem... a lesson from Bill O'Leary on how to play nice.  Good
lord.. thanks for that chuckle.  I'll forward this to Kevin so maybe
he can email you and get back the money you've owed him for years.
I'm sure he can put aside your threats to kill his wife. You know..
the one you referred to as "the bitch".

So, there you have it.... If push comes to shove as people know I am
not opposed to posting his emails here.

Yes, we know you aren't either.  We are relying on it, along with your
careful editing of them.  It seems to me he has opted to not bring
this to the forum.  I never said anything other than mention that I
was emailed about you, however I knew you would bite. I won a bet in
saying it would be within day before you responded by showing yourself
on AGR.  Thanks for helping me win that bet!

BTW, I have been on the side for awhile.... work and family has me too
busy for the bullshit here.

Sure, yet you magically appear on the newsgroup with nothing more than
the mere mention of the words Preacha Bill.   Beetlejuice!

hello userohlooney(at) XXXX.com:

hey, i did not know this was moderated! cotopaxi was banned.
extremely futile, i can easily open 1,000 google accounts, and will
now increase my posting
rate.

i WOULD leave, but the "owner" is intentionally providing a playground
for william o'leary to stalk and harrass non-users, and over subjects
having no connection to rainbow
gatherings, as he has for years on this board.

i was actually thinking about letting the board go, but not any more.
i consider this a challenge... like a rubik's cube, except with dirty,
filthy hippies
instead of colored squares.

this board is never going to be the same.

to user ohlooney

the following is my opinion.
good luck challenging an opinion in court, ohlloney.

her ex BF let her move in for a couple of months. she had no job, and
spoke of  no plans to get one.
fictional plans materialized during her scamming me out of money. then
they went away.
he rented a second place to be away from her on weekends. he dint have
the heart to throw anyone out. it was summer,
she had a van, he should have thrown her out. she took over his room,
and started to pretend she was
a real roommate.

when her "BF" took off after work every friday to another city, she
did not get the hint. when he returned after
work on monday night, she did not get the hint.

what they discussed is not my buisiness,a nd im glad i dont know.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

until that summer none of us knew her as far as i know.

she cleaned. a lot. (in 2008 she used this as an excuse why she was
"screwed over") rommmate M made it explicitly clear he WANTED it
messy, and predicted in advance she would try to claim some benefit
from it.
he hit the nail on the head.

the only person on the lease, M, got tired of her. she masqueraded as
the alpha hippie, and made vicious
personal verbal attacks on several people , ordering them to leave,
even though she was a non-paying guest.
she pulled this on me personally, and at least 2 other guests.

she smashed things,while turning beet red and screaming. including
unwelcome furniture she dragged in from the trash.
she cleaned up a back yard M never set foot in. she claimed this made
her owed things in return, which again M had predicted.

(there were serveral guests, because we were very close-knit, not
including her.)

so 3 things happened.

one:
mike reinstated all his "86'ed" friends, and gave her the boot.

he said "i don't like the way you treat my friends"

two"

the landlord demanded her out anyway, because she was violating the
terms of the lease.

three:

N the BF, told her the same, after the fact, in a private
conversation.

o'leary lied. i had nothing to do with any of this, and out of respect
for my friends, left for a week anyway.
i had already moved out 5 nights a week before this happened.
i wasn't staying there at night while M threw her out. i returned
afterward, and a couple of weeks later, had a new place.

her BF let her have a place to live after breaking up with her, and
she talks this evil trash about him
on the internet. she was a total mental case and EVERYONE wanted her
out.

she parasitized a member of the crew for a while , who she met at this
house, and after that she left town PERIOD. i had no way to reach her.

thats enough typing for one day. she's lying about thinking the ex
paid me, and thats a total bag ...

read more »- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

to user ohlooney:

the following is my opinion:

engel was a homeless hippie who found a BF willing to let her crash
for a couple of months rent-free ans
he toiled 55 hour weeks at a stressful job.

he let her stay long after he dumped her.

she required him to spell it out, a month later, and by that time the
other rommmate an the landlord had ad
ernough of her.

it listed about 3 months, maybe 2 1/2.
he did NOTHING whatsover to f** her over.

she skipped town on a loan that she used to pay for a vehicle, for her
use alone.
he had no interest in the van to beginwith... he enjoyed his bike ride
to work,
and we have a tranist system thats cheaper than operating that
vehicle.

she is a total nutjob to try to convince anyone, ever that she
"expected" the BF to pay, and has contradicted that flat-out, o'leary-
style lie in writing.

lynell engel is a premeditated thief, period.

she recently concocted the BF payment story, after she had already
told me she owed, but refused to pay,....
and intended to bring her mental inless up in small claims court to
thwart my collections efforts.,......


all of this is in writing.


does o'leary have any friends other than this o'leary clone?


her posts have not stopped what is coming, oreven slowed it down.
.

Relevant Pages