Re: Selective snipping: was/Re: Selective Memory (was) Re: Name calling, and other playground games:
- From: Mariah Kaze <mariahkaze@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 10:51:44 -0700
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 07:51:03 -0800 (PST), Sanity
<sanity-clause@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Dec 12, 8:29 am, Mariah Kaze <mariahk...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 03:42:34 -0800 (PST), Sanity
<sanity-cla...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The ol' "he who defines the terms wins" debater's axiom. Well guess
what sweetie; language is a convention and neither of us has standing
to dictate to the other's reason, so kiss off bitch! :^)
<chuckle> I thought that might have been it. You snipped the part I
was referring to, as well as Lincoln's caveat against dictating to
people's reason lext they close their minds to you; as you have also
with lillPEOPLE with your insults...
Now, just who started the name calling flame bait?
You did, when you assumed "color of office" [BOVIER'S or BLACKS LAW
DICTIONARIES both give the same definition] to dictate to my reason by
insisting words have "very precise meanings" which you further imply I
do not qualify to understand in that I lack the proper academic
accreditation (how snooty is that?). Language is a convention, an art
form, and forever in flux; hence, imprecise; science of etymology and
like that. I think you should try verifying that with AGR?s resident
poet Miranda, since your manifest penis envy seems to bias you against
people who actually have balls. Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, and all
them other high-fallootin? Greeks got their sheep-skin diplomas right
off of real sheep with real knives; they lived a lot closer to the
land in those days? :^)
MK<I just *love* flame wars you jar head, bring it *on* >
I give as good as, or better than, I get. Don't try to convince
people I'm not a scowler...
Peace, Sanity
You will note, the name "Federal Government" was originally "General
Government" and that the "Supreme Court" was initially referred to as
"The Judicial Power". The sentence diagram model is "cute" but the
structure of the court system is hierarchical rather than linear. I
guess even "geniuses" can be guilty of basing their arguments on
flawed logic.
The person who brings the claim that the existence of the Supreme
Court is not constitutionally valid is engaging in a mere quibble over
semantics in order to resist the color of authority. This seems to be
a "chronic" problem in his life. I learned all of this in first year
law at the University of Wyoming, Class of 1997.
Signed,
*The* Bitch who now has you by your furry little balls.
Mariah Kaze
"The wind is like the air, only pushier"
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: trippy space stuff.
- Next by Date: Re: Selective snipping: was/Re: Selective Memory (was) Re: Name calling, and other playground games:
- Previous by thread: Selective snipping: was/Re: Selective Memory (was) Re: Name calling, and other playground games:
- Next by thread: Re: Selective snipping: was/Re: Selective Memory (was) Re: Name calling, and other playground games:
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
