Re: 2009 Operational Plan

On Dec 3, 2:50 pm, Sanity <sanity-cla...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Dec 3, 11:17 am, Old Tom <rascal...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Dec 3, 8:53 am, Sanity <sanity-cla...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:.

I hope you're being facetious, otherwise that's an insult.

Of course it's an insult. You suddenly think I worry about subtlety.
I think your comments to Stella were snotty and patronizing.  Just
like Precaha Bill.  No, I'm still not Plunker

As with Stella and Lookingheart, once the word oligarchy is found in
your post, I move on.  The rant is entirely predictable and
repetitious.

Old Tom

Who died and bequeathed moderator status to Tom?
"I refuse to even check." - Stella = a snotty closed mind...
<S>

Snotty? Want to explain how that is anything other than name calling?
There is a difference between having an open mind and having given
the
benifit of the doubt until there is no shred of doubt left. If I ever
see
you or Steve on the land then I will start to give a shit about what
you
write on the internet ... maybe

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: 2009 Operational Plan
    ... I think your comments to Stella were snotty and patronizing. ... like Precaha Bill. ...  No, I'm still not Plunker ...
    (alt.gathering.rainbow)
  • Re: 2009 Operational Plan
    ... I think your comments to Stella were snotty and patronizing. ...  No, I'm still not Plunker ... I know that because I gave him the benifit of the doubt for a long ...
    (alt.gathering.rainbow)
  • Re: 2009 Operational Plan
    ... I think your comments to Stella were snotty and patronizing. ...  No, I'm still not Plunker ... you or Steve on the land then I will start to give a shit about what ...
    (alt.gathering.rainbow)
  • Re: 2009 Operational Plan
    ... I think your comments to Stella were snotty and patronizing. ... like Precaha Bill. ...  No, I'm still not Plunker ...
    (alt.gathering.rainbow)