My latest pamphlet:

Working title is: "Checks and Balances?" Would you guys please proof
read this for me and show me where I screwed up on my reasoning?
Thanks.
..............................................................................................
Here's the rub: The judiciary isn't spoz'ta decide what the law IS at
any time; deciding what the law IS, is the function of legislation not
adjudication.
“legislate” = (v) to decide what the law is
“adjudicate” = (v) to make a judicial finding
“judicial” = (adj) appropriate for judges

One of the lawful functions of the judicial magistracy is to act as a
check and a balance against unconstitutional legislation, that is, to
determine what the law IS NOT whenever legislation conflicts with the
constitutional paradigm; no law being preferred to unconstitutional
color of law. Courts of chancery ruling in equity, not law, can
always fashion remedies for injustices on an individual case basis,
but quasi-judicial legislation defeats all checks and balances
manifesting tyranny.

Wanting this “Justice” to rule on one issue and that “Justice” to rule
on another validates my thesis that US government is an oligarchy not
a representative republic; for if the sovereignty were “of the people
by the people and for the people” no judge would have the temerity to
send his “sovereign” out of the room because there was something going
on they shouldn’t be allowed to know, and no judge would dare
legislate… Judges are spoz’ta be our servants, not our lords and
masters.

The ‘pudding’ at issue is: “Do the people serve the government, or
does government serve us?” [Terms of contradiction evince issues. I
can give you that in Latin if I must.] The I Ching calls this issue,
“the relationship between prince and servitor.” So, in which
direction does the power of government flow? “The proof of the
pudding is in the eating.” – Anon.

As a rogue judiciary is antithetical to constitutional government, so
too: “Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and the
government when it deserves it.” - Mark Twain

Food for thought, Sanity Clause RE http://sanityclause.com/


.

Relevant Pages

  • British judges admit government seeks to subvert the rule of law
    ... Senior judges have accused politicians of seeking to subvert the rule of law ... Government and opposition MPs. ... Ackner, a former law lord, accused Mr Howard of going too far. ...
    (soc.culture.malaysia)
  • Re: 102 foreign criminals we cannot deport - because of HRA.
    ... been appealed and resolved by upper courts, ... The ECHR is incompatible with UK law and tradition, ... The ECHR is being misapplied by many judges (because they are ... Should the government decide the judges interpretation is not what was intended they should change the law to remove that ambiguity and avoid introducing any further ambiguity - some hope on the last point. ...
    (uk.legal)
  • Re: Is rule of law important for Australia government to follow???
    ... Australia does a pretty damn good job of it, from what I gathered from discussion with indigenous attorneys in my numerous visits. ... The "rule of law" is always important to the people of any given jurisdiction, for reasons I will express here in terms of American law ... Thus, to the extent Australia's government reflects the will of its populace, it is important to the government, as well. ... Finally and ultimately, judges are “creatures of the law,” thus accountable to the law and the people which give it force. ...
    (misc.legal)
  • As it will be published:
    ... This is the final edit of my latest pamphlet: "Who's in Charge Here?" ... Does U.S. government serve us, ... the judiciary could never decide what the law IS; ... servant judges never dictate to a Sovereign ...
    (alt.gathering.rainbow)
  • Re: Fairness Doctrine -- yes or no?
    ... since they all "make you end up in court". ... for violating the law, not some nebulous and ill-defined "spirit" of the ... that doesn't automatically make it hate. ... and form of government is that rights are inherent." ...
    (rec.arts.tv)