Re: Issue re-stated re. proposed fuel economy experiment.
- From: Chuck <livinglight@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 10:01:17 -0700 (PDT)
On Aug 3, 1:57 am, Sanity <sanity-cla...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Aug 2, 5:33 pm, Chuck <livingli...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Aug 2, 10:31 am, Sanity <sanity-cla...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Aug 2, 12:07 pm, rAzZbAr <gl...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Aug 2, 4:07 am, Sanity <sanity-cla...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I suggest you start a Thread on the Subject instead of trying to co-
opt this one ala Carl Rove
Thank you for the suggestion.
You're welcome.
Not to interrupt, but with today’s technology being what it is it
occurred to me that one of our resources is being overlooked and it
may be the answer to the battery storage dilemma. Now that we have
nano technology and there has been (for the longest time) radio waves
in the air non-stop in metropolitan areas why not harness it. Here’s
how it works (maybe); the sound we hear coming from a radio is the
amplification of the vibrating crystal. If (through nano technology)
there were a microscopic magneto attached to each side and coils in
placed to capture the movement, it occurs to me that that should
produce electricity. Even if it’s a millionth of one volt we’re
talking about a near micro-generator which means millions of these
things ran in series would still be relatively small and contained in
something as small as a microprocessor (let’s call that a clump as
opposed to a chip). Now imagine this; whatever the voltage needed to
recharge a battery (and say each clump is designed to output one volt)
then you would only need that number of clumps in the charger. The
charger wouldn’t need to be plugged into anything because all it would
require is an antenna a dial and perhaps a meter to gauge the strength
of the signal. Make this happen and I’ll settle for 10% of the net
profits (honor system applies). Not for corporate or government use
and please consider the environment during development and
production. Please!
Chuck
By publishing this information it is now deemed a non-patentable
device. Therefore anyone may produce it.
An electronics whiz read the Torah and realized the Ark of the
Covenant is a huge capacitor, He told his professor and they set about
to build a 1:1 size duplicate according to the instructions given to
see what would happen; gopher wood from Africa, gold leaf, the whole 9
yards in every jot and tittle. The thing started to build up a charge
just from having background cosmic radiation pass through it and was
becoming too dangerous to have around so it had to be dismantled...
As Tesla knew, the Earth captures electrical energy from the sun
because it is magnetic. (There are aproximately 200 lightning strikes
per second.) Tesla wanted electrical energy to be free to all and I
believe it can be. My point is, and my motivation for starting this
Thread is: practical application of the EMF (Electro-Motive-Force). I
consider power generation incidental to its application.
Peace, Sanity
While I agree with you that energy is free building a device to
capture that energy isn’t, at least not in a capital society. It only
stands to reason that a cost need be applied to the purchase of such
devices with a small percentage added to the cost of production to
facilitate further development. Those whose business it is to deliver
energy to the masses will find themselves out of business should the
day come when everyone has a device that can capture the free energy.
However, these devices will likely be in need of maintenance
(replacement parts and service) and that will create another
industry. Free is as far as free goes.
Chuck
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Issue re-stated re. proposed fuel economy experiment.
- From: Sanity
- Re: Issue re-stated re. proposed fuel economy experiment.
- From: rAzZbAr
- Re: Issue re-stated re. proposed fuel economy experiment.
- From: Sanity
- Re: Issue re-stated re. proposed fuel economy experiment.
- From: rAzZbAr
- Re: Issue re-stated re. proposed fuel economy experiment.
- From: Sanity
- Re: Issue re-stated re. proposed fuel economy experiment.
- From: rAzZbAr
- Re: Issue re-stated re. proposed fuel economy experiment.
- From: Sanity
- Re: Issue re-stated re. proposed fuel economy experiment.
- From: Chuck
- Re: Issue re-stated re. proposed fuel economy experiment.
- From: Sanity
- Issue re-stated re. proposed fuel economy experiment.
- Prev by Date: NOGUNS: A CONCEPT THAT WANTS TO LIVE ON EARTH
- Next by Date: Re: Booted by Forest Service, Scouts now help fight fires
- Previous by thread: Re: Issue re-stated re. proposed fuel economy experiment.
- Next by thread: Re: Issue re-stated re. proposed fuel economy experiment.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|